Use of Antipsychotic Medications in Australian States and Territories Between July 1995 and December 2001

2003 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 267-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Mond ◽  
Rodney Morice ◽  
Cathy Owen

Objective: To examine trends in the use of oral conventional, depot and atypical antipsychotic medications in Australian States and Territories between 1995 and 2001. Methods: For each 6 month interval between July 1995 and December 2001, prescription data obtained were converted into a measure of drug utilization expressed as the number of defined daily doses per thousand population per day (DDDs/1000/day). Data concerning the major specialty of the prescriber were available for the period 1996–2000. Results: In each State and Territory, use of atypical antipsychotic medications increased markedly while use of oral conventional and depot medications declined. Between July 2001 and December 2001, the proportion of total prescriptions for antipsychotic medications accounted for by prescriptions for atypical medications varied from 63.1% in South Australia to 76.1% in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT). Relative use of atypical medications was higher in the ACT than in other regions, while relative use of depot medications was higher in the Northern Territory than in other regions. During the year 2000, the proportion of prescriptions for oral conventional and depot medications written by general practitioners (GPs) exceeded 75% in all regions other than the ACT. Between 1996 and 2000, the proportion of prescriptions for atypical medications written by GPs increased markedly in all regions but remained lower than for oral conventional and depot medications. Conclusions: Atypical antipsychotic medications have replaced conventional medications as the first-line pharmacological treatment for psychotic disorders in all regions of Australia. Continued expansion of programmes designed to foster collaboration between GPs and mental health services will be essential in achieving optimal prescribing of antipsychotic medications.

2003 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Mond ◽  
Rodney Morice ◽  
Cathy Owen ◽  
Ailsa Korten

Objective: To examine trends in the use of oral conventional, depot and atypical antipsychotic medications in Australia between July 1995 and December 2001. Method: For each six-month interval between July 1995 and December 2001, prescription data obtained from the Health Insurance Commission of Australia were converted into a measure of drug utilization expressed as the number of defined daily doses per thousand population per day (DDDs/1000/day). Results: Between July 1995 and December 2001, use of atypical medications increased from an estimated 0.27 to an estimated 3.83 DDDs/1000/day. Use of oral conventional medications decreased from 1.76 to 0.91 DDDs/1000/day, while use of depot medications decreased from 1.38 to 0.96 DDDs/1000/day. During the latter half of 2001, atypical medications accounted for 67.3%, oral conventional medications for 16.0%, and depot medications for 16.7% of total prescriptions for antipsychotic medications dispensed through community pharmacies in Australia. The increased use of atypical medications was accounted for largely by a dramatic increase in the use of olanzapine. Between July 2001 and December 2001, prescriptions for olanzapine accounted for 65.0% of total prescriptions for atypical antipsychotic medications. Conclusions: The results of the present study confirm that atypical antipsychotic medications have replaced conventional medications as the first-line pharmacological treatment for psychotic illness in Australia. While this change in prescribing practice is gratifying, the overwhelming preference for the use of olanzapine among clinicians prescribing antipsychotic medication is surprising and is of some concern given the significant increases in body weight that can accompany long-term use of this medication.


2001 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 285-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter F Buckley ◽  
Del D Miller ◽  
Beth Singer ◽  
Karl Donenwirth

Critical Care ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kunal Karamchandani ◽  
Robert S. Schoaps ◽  
Jillian Printz ◽  
Jeffrey M. Kowaleski ◽  
Zyad J. Carr

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Liliana P. Ferreira ◽  
Tiago F. Ferreira ◽  
Filipe F. Godinho ◽  
Maria Carlota Tomé ◽  
Carlos J. Vieira ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document