Abstract
Background
Among all subsets of coronary artery lesions, bifurcations stand out due to high incidence, demanding percutaneous interventions (PCIs) and poor outcomes. Amid the different PCI strategies, the provisional (PS) approach is generally recommended over 2-stent (TS) techniques, but this paradigm has been challenged.
Purpose
To compare PS with TS for PCI of coronary bifurcation lesions, concerning procedural aspects and both immediate and long-term patient outcomes.
Methods
Retrospective study encompassing patients consecutively referred to a tertiary interventional cardiology unit for coronary angiography, who were found to have at least 1 native bifurcation lesion. According to operator experience and angiographic features, patients were managed with PS or/(and) TS. Procedural aspects regarding radiological variables, angiographic success and immediate complications were reviewed, as were in-hospital outcomes. Besides, clinical follow-up, by clinic appointment or telephone calling, was performed targeting stent failure, target vessel revascularization (TVR), acute coronary syndromes (ACS), heart failure and mortality.
Results
From January 2010 to June 2017, 404 patients with 433 bifurcation lesions were included. Median age was 70 (62–77) years and 25.3% were female. Median follow-up was 2 (1–3) years. Chronic angina was the dominant PCI context (61.3%) with 9.7% presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI). Medina class 1,1,1 was documented in 54.1% and 64.9% of lesions were hailed as true bifurcations. 303 patients underwent PS, whereas 67 were managed with TS, with TAP (43.3%) and mini-crush (34.3%) as the leading techniques. True bifurcations were more frequently approached with TS (p<0.001), whereas PCI context did not influence procedure selection. Fluoroscopy time (p<0.001), radiation dose (p=0.003) and contrast volume (p=0.009) were higher in the TS subgroup. OCT guidance (p=0.039) was also more common with TS. Angiographic success was uniformly high (95.1% for PS and 97% for TS), while procedural complications, including iatrogenic coronary dissections (7.4%, mostly minor) and slow-reflow (3.5%), were homogenously low. Acute kidney injury and type 4a MI occurred in 14.5% and 32.3%, respectively, also with no difference between groups. As for long-term outcomes, stent failure, encompassing both stent thrombosis (1 event) and restenosis (4.2%), occurred more often with TS (p=0.046), with ACS events (9.5%) following the same trend (p=0.08). In turn, rates of TVR (12.5%), heart failure hospitalization (6.2%) and mortality, regardless of its cardiovascular nature, were similar.
Conclusion
PS outperforms TS during follow-up, particularly due to lower stent failure odds. Thus, this study further supports the concept of PS as the standard approach for coronary bifurcation lesions.
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding source: None
Single‐ Versus 2‐Stent Strategies for Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Trials With Long‐Term Follow‐up
