Accuracy of method of moments and weighted index method

1987 ◽  
Vol 23 (15) ◽  
pp. 784 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.A. Roberts ◽  
M.S. Stern
1990 ◽  
Vol 137 (1) ◽  
pp. 27 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.C. Kendall ◽  
M.J. Robertson ◽  
P.W.A. McIlroy ◽  
S. Ritchie ◽  
M.J. Adams

1998 ◽  
Vol 34 (10) ◽  
pp. 1890-1903 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.J. Noble ◽  
J.P. Loehr ◽  
J.A. Lott

1989 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. 2105-2111 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.J. Robertson ◽  
P.C. Kendall ◽  
S. Ritchie ◽  
P.W.A. McIlroy ◽  
M.J. Adams

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 126-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tour Liu ◽  
Tian Lan ◽  
Tao Xin

Abstract. Random response is a very common aberrant response behavior in personality tests and may negatively affect the reliability, validity, or other analytical aspects of psychological assessment. Typically, researchers use a single person-fit index to identify random responses. This study recommends a three-step person-fit analysis procedure. Unlike the typical single person-fit methods, the three-step procedure identifies both global misfit and local misfit individuals using different person-fit indices. This procedure was able to identify more local misfit individuals than single-index method, and a graphical method was used to visualize those particular items in which random response behaviors appear. This method may be useful to researchers in that it will provide them with more information about response behaviors, allowing better evaluation of scale administration and development of more plausible explanations. Real data were used in this study instead of simulation data. In order to create real random responses, an experimental test administration was designed. Four different random response samples were produced using this experimental system.


1990 ◽  
Vol 137 (1) ◽  
pp. 21 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.S. Stern ◽  
P.C. Kendall ◽  
P.W.A. McLlroy

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document