Three-step imputation of missing values in condition monitoring datasets

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (16) ◽  
pp. 3288-3300
Author(s):  
Hang Liu ◽  
Youyuan Wang ◽  
WeiGen Chen
2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 260-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Panagiotis Loukopoulos ◽  
George Zolkiewski ◽  
Ian Bennett ◽  
Pericles Pilidis ◽  
Fang Duan ◽  
...  

Purpose Centrifugal compressors are integral components in oil industry, thus effective maintenance is required. Condition-based maintenance and prognostics and health management (CBM/PHM) have been gaining popularity. CBM/PHM can also be performed remotely leading to e-maintenance. Its success depends on the quality of the data used for analysis and decision making. A major issue associated with it is the missing data. Their presence may compromise the information within a set, causing bias or misleading results. Addressing this matter is crucial. The purpose of this paper is to review and compare the most widely used imputation techniques in a case study using condition monitoring measurements from an operational industrial centrifugal compressor. Design/methodology/approach Brief overview and comparison of most widely used imputation techniques using a complete set with artificial missing values. They were tested regarding the effects of the amount, the location within the set and the variable containing the missing values. Findings Univariate and multivariate imputation techniques were compared, with the latter offering the smallest error levels. They seemed unaffected by the amount or location of the missing data although they were affected by the variable containing them. Research limitations/implications During the analysis, it was assumed that at any time only one variable contained missing data. Further research is still required to address this point. Originality/value This study can serve as a guide for selecting the appropriate imputation method for missing values in centrifugal compressor condition monitoring data.


Marketing ZFP ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 21-32
Author(s):  
Dirk Temme ◽  
Sarah Jensen

Missing values are ubiquitous in empirical marketing research. If missing data are not dealt with properly, this can lead to a loss of statistical power and distorted parameter estimates. While traditional approaches for handling missing data (e.g., listwise deletion) are still widely used, researchers can nowadays choose among various advanced techniques such as multiple imputation analysis or full-information maximum likelihood estimation. Due to the available software, using these modern missing data methods does not pose a major obstacle. Still, their application requires a sound understanding of the prerequisites and limitations of these methods as well as a deeper understanding of the processes that have led to missing values in an empirical study. This article is Part 1 and first introduces Rubin’s classical definition of missing data mechanisms and an alternative, variable-based taxonomy, which provides a graphical representation. Secondly, a selection of visualization tools available in different R packages for the description and exploration of missing data structures is presented.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document