scholarly journals Probing protoplanetary disk evolution in the Chamaeleon II region

Author(s):  
M. Villenave ◽  
F. Menard ◽  
W. R. F. Dent ◽  
M. Benisty ◽  
G. van der Plas ◽  
...  
2009 ◽  
Vol 699 (2) ◽  
pp. 1454-1472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konstantin V. Getman ◽  
Eric D. Feigelson ◽  
Kevin L. Luhman ◽  
Aurora Sicilia-Aguilar ◽  
Junfeng Wang ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (S299) ◽  
pp. 374-375
Author(s):  
Kévin Baillié ◽  
Sébastien Charnoz

AbstractBased on a self-consistent coupling between protoplanetary disk thermodynamics, photosphere geometry and dynamics we designed a 1D-hydrodynamical numerical model for the spreading of the disks as a function of the star characteristics. We found that the evolution timescale increases for more massive or for a steeper surface density disk, and decreases for bigger stars or less turbulent disks. We found a strong dependency of the mass accretion rate versus the disk mass and a weaker dependency versus the star mass. Coupled with observed similar conclusions, we derived that the disk mass is scaling as M*1.6.


2020 ◽  
Vol 281 ◽  
pp. 135-148
Author(s):  
Nikitha Susan Saji ◽  
Daniel Wielandt ◽  
Jesper Christian Holst ◽  
Martin Bizzarro

2013 ◽  
Vol 554 ◽  
pp. A43 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Daemgen ◽  
M. G. Petr-Gotzens ◽  
S. Correia ◽  
P. S. Teixeira ◽  
W. Brandner ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 567 (2) ◽  
pp. 1183-1191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth Wood ◽  
C. J. Lada ◽  
J. E. Bjorkman ◽  
Scott J. Kenyon ◽  
Barbara Whitney ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 653 (1) ◽  
pp. L57-L60 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Bouwman ◽  
W. A. Lawson ◽  
C. Dominik ◽  
E. D. Feigelson ◽  
Th. Henning ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 5 (H15) ◽  
pp. 766-766
Author(s):  
Adam L. Kraus ◽  
Michael J. Ireland

AbstractInteractions with close stellar or planetary companions can significantly influence the evolution and lifetime of protoplanetary disks. It has recently become possible to search for these companions, directly studying the role of multiplicity in protoplanetary disk evolution. We have described an ongoing survey to directly detect these stellar and planetary companions in nearby star-forming regions. Our program uses adaptive optics and sparse aperture mask interferometry to achieve typical contrast limits of Δ K=5-6 at the diffraction limit (5–8 MJup at 5–30 AU), while also detecting similar-flux binary companions at separations as low as 15 mas (2.5 AU). In most cases, our survey has found no evidence of companions (planetary or binary) among the well-known “transitional disk” systems; if the inner clearings are due to planet formation, as has been previously suggested, then this paucity places an upper limit on the mass of any resulting planet. Our survey also has uncovered many new binary systems, with the majority falling among the diskless (WTTS) population. This disparity suggests that disk evolution for close (5–30 AU) binary systems is very different from that for single stars. As we show in Figure 1, most circumbinary disks are cleared by ages of 1–2 Myr, while most circumstellar disks are not. These diskless binary systems have biased the disk frequency downward in previous studies. If we remove our new systems from those samples, we find that the disk fraction for single stars could be higher than was previously suggested.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document