scholarly journals Research on Landscape Architecture Design Based on Corporate Social Responsibilities

2021 ◽  
Vol 237 ◽  
pp. 04034
Author(s):  
Xinying Zhang ◽  
Wenjie Chen

As the natural environment becomes growingly deteriorated, environmental protection becomes a global common concern. Landscape architecture (LA) is concerned about the relationship among humans, the built, and natural environments, so it is of special significance to study corporate social responsibilities (CSR) of LA firms. This paper studied CSR of LA firms from the perspective of landscape architects, i.e., this paper explored LA design based on corporate social responsibilities. CSR of LA firms was classified into economic responsibilities and green responsibilities, so this paper studied LA design based on economic responsibilities and green responsibilities respectively. This paper contributes to the existing study of LA design by innovatively adding corporate social responsibilities into the LA design philosophies.

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 162-188
Author(s):  
Fitri Humairoh

The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of Corporate Social Responsibility and Managerial Ownership on Firm’s Value, analysis profitability as moderating variable in the relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility with firm's value and Managerial Ownership with Firm's Value. And also to examine Firm Size as a moderating variable in the relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility with firm's value and Managerial Ownership with Firm’s Value. Data for this research were obtained from the firm's annual report and financial statement on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) site. A sample used in this research are 120 manufacturing companies that listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2013-2015. The sampling technique used is purposive sampling method. This research uses a regression analysis. Based on the analysis it can be concluded that the significant positive effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on firm’s value. Managerial Ownership has no effect on a firm's value. Profitability can be a moderating variable between Corporate Social Responsibilities with Firm's Value, but cannot be a moderate variable between Managerial Ownership with Firm’s Value. Firm Size cannot be a moderating variable between Corporate Social Responsibilities with Firm's Value and cannot be a moderating variable between Managerial Ownership with Firm's Value.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 191
Author(s):  
Tasya Tasya

<p><em>The purpose of this research is to find the effect of Corporate Social Responsibilities and Liquidity on Earning Response Coefficient with Capital Structure as a moderating variable. The sample in this research uses companies in the Mining sector for the period of 2016 – 2018. The criteria in determining the sample of this research are companies listed on the IDX, have The criteria in determining this research sample are companies listed on the IDX, have a complete annual report and CSR disclosure in the 2016 – 2018 period. From these criteria found 63 samples for research. In brief, the results of this research explained that Corporate Social Responsibilities and Liquidity have no significant effect on Earning Response Coefficient, and also Capital Structure can’t moderate the relationship between Corporate Social Responsibilities and Liquidity on Earning Response Coefficient.</em></p>


Author(s):  
Bich Thi Ngoc Nguyen ◽  
Hai Thi Thanh Tran ◽  
Oanh Hoang Le ◽  
Phuoc Thi Nguyen ◽  
Thien Hiep Trinh ◽  
...  

A number of studies in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) have suggested that corporates accountable for social responsibilities had better financial performance. However, this relationship had remained undiscovered in Vietnam. The purpose of this research was to examine a link between Corporate Social Responsibility disclosures and firm value in Vietnam. A sample of 50 companies listed on stock exchanges in Hochiminh City (HOSE) and Hanoi (HNX) were investigated from 2010 to 2013. Content of annual reports were analyzed to measure corporate social responsibilities, and Tobin’s Q ratio was proxied for firm value. Regression analysis tests indicated that social responsibility disclosures are associated with following year’s firm value. Specifically, the relationship between environmental information provision and following year’s firm value was positive, while that between employee disclosures and firm value was negative. The results show a positive sign for Vietnamese firms that take on environmental responsibilities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document