scholarly journals Coupling non-local rheology and volume of fluid (VOF) method: a finite volume method (FVM) implementation

2021 ◽  
Vol 249 ◽  
pp. 03025
Author(s):  
Dorian Faroux ◽  
Kimiaki Washino ◽  
Takuya Tsuji ◽  
Toshitsugu Tanaka

Additional to a behavior switching between solid-like and liquid-like, dense granular flows also present propagating grain size-dependent effects also called non-local effects. Such behaviors cannot be efficiently modeled by standard rheologies such as µ(I)-rheology but have to be dealt with advanced non-local models. Unfortunately, these models are still new and cannot be used easily nor be used for various configurations. We propose in this work a FVM implementation of the recently popular NGF model coupled with the VOF method in order to both make non-local modeling more accessible to everyone and suitable not only for single-phase flows but also for two-phase flows. The proposed implementation has the advantage to be extremely straightforward and to only require a supplementary stabilization loop compared to the theoretical equations. We then applied our new framework to both single and two-phase flows for validation.

2020 ◽  
Vol 213 ◽  
pp. 104715
Author(s):  
Rihua Yang ◽  
Heng Li ◽  
Aiming Yang

Entropy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 1039
Author(s):  
Maren Hantke ◽  
Ferdinand Thein

Liquid–vapor flows exhibiting phase transition, including phase creation in single-phase flows, are of high interest in mathematics, as well as in the engineering sciences. In two preceding articles the authors showed on the one hand the capability of the isothermal Euler equations to describe such phenomena (Hantke and Thein, arXiv, 2017, arXiv:1703.09431). On the other hand they proved the nonexistence of certain phase creation phenomena in flows governed by the full system of Euler equations, see Hantke and Thein, Quart. Appl. Math. 2015, 73, 575–591. In this note, the authors close the gap for two-phase flows by showing that the two-phase flows considered are not possible when the flow is governed by the full Euler equations, together with the regular Rankine-Hugoniot conditions. The arguments rely on the fact that for (regular) fluids, the differences of the entropy and the enthalpy between the liquid and the vapor phase of a single substance have a strict sign below the critical point.


Author(s):  
Germano Scarabeli Custódio Assunção ◽  
Dykenlove Marcelin ◽  
João Carlos Von Hohendorff Filho ◽  
Denis José Schiozer ◽  
Marcelo Souza De Castro

Abstract Estimate pressure drop throughout petroleum production and transport system has an important role to properly sizing the various parameters involved in those complex facilities. One of the most challenging variables used to calculate the pressure drop is the friction factor, also known as Darcy–Weisbach’s friction factor. In this context, Colebrook’ s equation is recognized by many engineers and scientists as the most accurate equation to estimate it. However, due to its computational cost, since it is an implicit equation, several explicit equations have been developed over the decades to accurately estimate friction factor in a straightforward way. This paper aims to investigate accuracy of 46 of those explicit equations and Colebrook implicit equation against 2397 experimental points from single-phase and two-phase flows, with Reynolds number between 3000 and 735000 and relative roughness between 0 and 1.40 × 10−3. Applying three different statistical metrics, we concluded that the best explicit equation, proposed by Achour et al. (2002), presented better accuracy to estimate friction factor than Colebrook’s equation. On the other hand, we also showed that equations developed by Wood (1966), Rao and Kumar (2007) and Brkić (2016) must be used in specifics conditions which were developed, otherwise can produce highly inaccurate results. The remaining equations presented good accuracy and can be applied, however, presented similar or lower accuracy than Colebrook’s equation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 408 ◽  
pp. 109176
Author(s):  
Quentin Carmouze ◽  
Richard Saurel ◽  
Alexandre Chiapolino ◽  
Emmanuel Lapebie

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document