Jules Horowitz Reactor Irradiation Devices: Inspection Methods proposal

Jules Horowitz Reactor (JHR) irradiation test devices (so called ADELINE and MADISON) must undergo a periodic inspection every 40 months (French ESP(N) Regulation). The first step of inspection proposal was performed from October 2019 to March 2020 and concerns application of non-destructive methods for electron beam welds, while examining the possible methods and locations that could be utilized. This study has been performed in collaboration between VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd and French CEA with VTT employee secondment at CEA Cadarache. The initial conclusions of this work are the following: • Two inspection methods are likely needed. • Eddy current is likely suitable for surface examination while volumetric ultrasonic inspection can be used for tube bodies. • Inspection under-water in a storage pool (EPI) is likely the best option for location in the JHR. • Some automation and remote controls will be needed during the inspection process. The inspection area is quite large as the whole tube bodies will be inspected. • Internal surfaces located between the nested tubes likely cannot be inspected for corrosion and therefore, sealing the space from oxygen and water will be likely be the best option. • Experimental reference is a critical next step of the work to assess and qualify the inspection methods. As the next step, CEA will continue discussions on requirements of the mock-ups: for eddy current inspection, a Zircaloy-4 planar specimen with artificial reflectors is needed. For ultrasonic reference, a representative mock-up of the cylinder with a weld and artificial defect(s) is needed. The mock-up testing will provide an experimental reference to CIVA calculations as simulations of this work have been performed with CIVA software, which is extensively used in the industry and research organizations in simulation of non-destructive control. This study will allow further steps in the future, up to the qualification of inspection methods for JHR test devices.

Download Full-text

Real Time Non-Destructive Testing Methods of Welding

Advanced Materials Research ◽

10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.933.109 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 933 ◽

pp. 109-116 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Paul Kah ◽

Belinga Mvola ◽

Jukka Martikainen ◽

Raimo Suoranta

Keyword(s):

Eddy Current ◽

Ultrasonic Inspection ◽

Non Destructive Testing ◽

Testing Methods ◽

Destructive Testing ◽

Welding Joint ◽

Physical Background ◽

Industrial Needs ◽

The Given ◽

Non Destructive

This work presents a review of the three most efficient non-destructive testing methods. The methods are radiography, eddy current and ultrasonic inspection. These particular techniques were chosen because they are able to cover most of the industrial needs for welding joint inspection. The aim of this work is to present the physical background of operation for the given methods, discuss their benefits, limitations, and typical areas of application, and compare them with each other. In the first part of this work, all three methods and their variations are described in detail with schemes and figures which represent their working principles. It appears that, although all the given methods can detect all types of flaws in welded joints, they have their specific limitations. For example, ultrasonic testing is able to detect defects only in certain directions. The eddy current technique is also sensitive to defect direction, but it can be applied for inspecting conductive materials only. The main flaw of radiography is the resolution: it is not usable for very fine defects. The second part of the work is for comparing the testing methods and for drawing the conclusions. The methods are compared according to the possible materials, defect types and their position, as well as the possible areas of application. This part gives the background for choosing a proper welding joint testing method for certain applications in the welding industry.

Download Full-text