scholarly journals Variational assimilation of altimeter data into a non-linear ocean model: temporal strategies

1998 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 21-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Blum ◽  
B. Luong ◽  
J. Verron
2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harley E. Hurlburt ◽  
Robert C. Rhodes ◽  
Charlie N. Barron ◽  
E. J. Metzger ◽  
Ole M. Smedstad

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 565-587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Jardak ◽  
Olivier Talagrand

Abstract. Data assimilation is considered as a problem in Bayesian estimation, viz. determine the probability distribution for the state of the observed system, conditioned by the available data. In the linear and additive Gaussian case, a Monte Carlo sample of the Bayesian probability distribution (which is Gaussian and known explicitly) can be obtained by a simple procedure: perturb the data according to the probability distribution of their own errors, and perform an assimilation on the perturbed data. The performance of that approach, called here ensemble variational assimilation (EnsVAR), also known as ensemble of data assimilations (EDA), is studied in this two-part paper on the non-linear low-dimensional Lorenz-96 chaotic system, with the assimilation being performed by the standard variational procedure. In this first part, EnsVAR is implemented first, for reference, in a linear and Gaussian case, and then in a weakly non-linear case (assimilation over 5 days of the system). The performances of the algorithm, considered either as a probabilistic or a deterministic estimator, are very similar in the two cases. Additional comparison shows that the performance of EnsVAR is better, both in the assimilation and forecast phases, than that of standard algorithms for the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) and particle filter (PF), although at a higher cost. Globally similar results are obtained with the Kuramoto–Sivashinsky (K–S) equation.


2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 3071-3104 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Forget ◽  
J.-M. Campin ◽  
P. Heimbach ◽  
C. N. Hill ◽  
R. M. Ponte ◽  
...  

Abstract. This paper presents the ECCO v4 non-linear inverse modeling framework and its baseline solution for the evolving ocean state over the period 1992–2011. Both components are publicly available and subjected to regular, automated regression tests. The modeling framework includes sets of global conformal grids, a global model setup, implementations of data constraints and control parameters, an interface to algorithmic differentiation, as well as a grid-independent, fully capable Matlab toolbox. The baseline ECCO v4 solution is a dynamically consistent ocean state estimate without unidentified sources of heat and buoyancy, which any interested user will be able to reproduce accurately. The solution is an acceptable fit to most data and has been found to be physically plausible in many respects, as documented here and in related publications. Users are being provided with capabilities to assess model–data misfits for themselves. The synergy between modeling and data synthesis is asserted through the joint presentation of the modeling framework and the state estimate. In particular, the inverse estimate of parameterized physics was instrumental in improving the fit to the observed hydrography, and becomes an integral part of the ocean model setup available for general use. More generally, a first assessment of the relative importance of external, parametric and structural model errors is presented. Parametric and external model uncertainties appear to be of comparable importance and dominate over structural model uncertainty. The results generally underline the importance of including turbulent transport parameters in the inverse problem.


2012 ◽  
Vol 49-50 ◽  
pp. 86-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Yu ◽  
Alexander L. Kurapov ◽  
Gary D. Egbert ◽  
John S. Allen ◽  
P. Michael Kosro

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document