From Identification and Review to Action—Maternal Mortality Review in the United States

2012 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia J. Berg
2017 ◽  
Vol 129 ◽  
pp. 26S-27S
Author(s):  
Adebayo Adesomo ◽  
Amanda McDonald ◽  
Ayamo G. Oben ◽  
Emma Rodriguez ◽  
Kayla Ireland ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 298-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samia Noursi ◽  
Janine Austin Clayton ◽  
Jacquelyn Campbell ◽  
Phyllis Sharps

Background: In the United States, rates of maternal morbidity and mortality (MMM) are high compared with other high-income countries and are characterized by significant racial/ethnic disparities. Typically, research on MMM focuses on obstetrical problems. Less research examines the role of intimate partner violence (IPV). Maternal health, IPV, and their intersection are linked with the impacts of social determinants of health. Objective: We sought to understand the intersection of MMM and IPV in the United States, particularly data issues that hinder research in this area and the resulting knowledge gaps. Methods: We identified major articles of interest regarding maternal morbidity and mortality and IPV in the United States and drafted a mini review based on relevant information. Results: Despite the prevalence of IPV during pregnancy, the intersection of maternal health and IPV has not been widely reviewed or discussed. Conclusion: There are a number of limitations in surveillance activities and data collection that underestimate the impact of IPV on MMM. Importantly, women who die by homicide or suicide— which in many cases is linked with IPV—are not counted as pregnancy-related deaths in the United States under the current definition. Establishing separate panels of local experts in maternal health or maternal mortality review committees (MMRCs) that are dedicated to examining violent deaths and use of the Maternal Mortality Review Information Application system would likely improve data accuracy of pregnancy-associated deaths. Based on the literature reviewed and limitations of current data, there are significant knowledge gaps on the effects of IPV and maternal health.


2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreea A. Creanga ◽  
Cynthia J. Berg ◽  
Jean Y. Ko ◽  
Sherry L. Farr ◽  
Van T. Tong ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 69-70
Author(s):  
N.L. Davis ◽  
D.L. Hoyert ◽  
D.A. Goodman ◽  
A.H. Hirai ◽  
W.M. Callaghan

2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 110-110
Author(s):  
K.S. Joseph ◽  
A. Boutin ◽  
S. Lisonkova ◽  
G.M. Muraca ◽  
N. Razaz ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 66 (5) ◽  
pp. 263-264
Author(s):  
Joy L. Hawkins ◽  
Jeani Chang ◽  
Susan K. Palmer ◽  
Charles P. Gibbs ◽  
William M. Callaghan

2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (35) ◽  
pp. 21194-21200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brad N. Greenwood ◽  
Rachel R. Hardeman ◽  
Laura Huang ◽  
Aaron Sojourner

Recent work has emphasized the benefits of patient–physician concordance on clinical care outcomes for underrepresented minorities, arguing it can ameliorate outgroup biases, boost communication, and increase trust. We explore concordance in a setting where racial disparities are particularly severe: childbirth. In the United States, Black newborns die at three times the rate of White newborns. Results examining 1.8 million hospital births in the state of Florida between 1992 and 2015 suggest that newborn–physician racial concordance is associated with a significant improvement in mortality for Black infants. Results further suggest that these benefits manifest during more challenging births and in hospitals that deliver more Black babies. We find no significant improvement in maternal mortality when birthing mothers share race with their physician.


2020 ◽  
Vol 222 (1) ◽  
pp. S454-S455
Author(s):  
Kimberly Bodenlos ◽  
Meike Schuster ◽  
Justin S. Brandt ◽  
Cande V. Ananth

2019 ◽  
Vol 221 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia S. Shellhaas ◽  
Julie Zaharatos ◽  
Linda Clayton ◽  
Afshan B. Hameed

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document