MRI Assessment of the Proximal Pole of the Scaphoid after Internal Fixation with a Titanium Alloy Herbert Screw

2001 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 326-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. GANAPATHI ◽  
R. SAVAGE ◽  
A. R. JONES

We report a series of scaphoid fractures fixed with titanium alloy Herbert screws in which postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) was used to assess the marrow signal in the proximal pole of the scaphoid and thus detect the presence of avascular necrosis. The artefact produced by the titanium alloy Herbert screw did not preclude this assessment.

2021 ◽  
pp. 028418512110645
Author(s):  
Ajay Sahu ◽  
Dorothy KC Kuek ◽  
Andrew MacCormick ◽  
Charles Gozzard ◽  
Tishi Ninan ◽  
...  

Background Suspected scaphoid fracture (SF) after a fall on an outstretched hand is a common presentation in the emergency department. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) has been suggested to assist in the diagnosis or exclusion of SF. Purpose To compare MRI and CT at diagnosing occult SFs. Material and Methods We routinely perform CT scans in patients with clinically suspected occult SF, after 7–10 days of injury following two negative radiographs. All eligible patients with a clinically suspected SF, but negative radiographs and a negative CT, underwent an MRI scan to assess further for evidence of occult fracture. Results A total of 100 patients were included in our study. MRI showed fractures in 16% of the time (in 15 patients) when plain radiographs and CT did not. Of these fractures, 8% were SFs. In addition to fractures, 10% had bone bruising. A total of 25% of patients with fractures and bone bruising were referred to the hand surgery team for further follow-up. Conclusion The study demonstrated that MRI would identify a radiographically occult SF more often than CT. This supports NICE guidelines which recommend MRI as the best early diagnostic tool for occult SFs.


2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (04) ◽  
pp. 405-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
James F. Griffith ◽  
Radhesh Krishna Lalam

AbstractWhen it comes to examining the brachial plexus, ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are complementary investigations. US is well placed for screening most extraforaminal pathologies, whereas MRI is more sensitive and accurate for specific clinical indications. For example, MRI is probably the preferred technique for assessment of trauma because it enables a thorough evaluation of both the intraspinal and extraspinal elements, although US can depict extraforaminal neural injury with a high level of accuracy. Conversely, US is probably the preferred technique for examination of neurologic amyotrophy because a more extensive involvement beyond the brachial plexus is the norm, although MRI is more sensitive than US for evaluating muscle denervation associated with this entity. With this synergy in mind, this review highlights the tips for examining the brachial plexus with US and MRI.


Endoscopy ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 36 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
BP McMahon ◽  
JB Frøkjær ◽  
A Bergmann ◽  
DH Liao ◽  
E Steffensen ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
pp. 10-23
Author(s):  
T. A. Akhadov ◽  
S. Yu. Guryakov ◽  
M. V. Ublinsky

For a long time, there was a need to apply magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique for lung visualization in clinical practice. The development of this method is stimulated by necessity of the emergence of an alternative to computed tomography, especially when radiation and injection of iodine-containing contrast agents are contraindicated or undesirable, for example, in pregnant women and children, people with intolerance to iodinated contrast. One of the reasons why lung MRI is still rarely used is lack of elaborated standardized protocols that would be adapted to clinical needs of medical society. This publication is a current literature review on the use of MRI in lung studies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document