Post-chemotherapy modified template retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in patients with nonseminomatous germ cell tumours

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murat Zor ◽  
Sercan Yilmaz ◽  
Bahadir Topuz ◽  
Engin Kaya ◽  
Serdar Yalcin ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction/background: Although a full bilateral template RPLND is thought to be the standard of care for the management of postchemotherapy retroperitoneal residual masses for nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT), in the past decade modified templates have become increasingly popular. In this study, we aimed to present our oncological and perioperative outcomes of consecutive seventeen NSGCT patients who underwent a modified template unilateral PC-RPLND for retroperitoneal residual disease. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the medical records of 17 consecutive NSGCT patients who underwent modified template unilateral PC-RPLND in our university hospital between 2017 and 2020. All patients had normal serum tumour markers with residual disease in the retroperitoneum. Surgical characteristics including the size of the retroperitoneal residual mass, residual tumor pathology, removed lymph nodes, positive percentage of removed lymph nodes, accompanying operations, complications, mean operation time and hospital stay, and long-term results including survival and antegrade ejaculation were evaluated. Results: Eleven patients underwent left and six right-sided surgery. Median residual lymph node diameter was 41mm. Median hospitalisation time was 3.5 days. Median follow-up time was 10.5 months. Necrosis/fibrosis was seen in 6 patients, and teratoma in 11 patients. No viable tumour was seen. No patients died in the follow-up period. None of the patients relapsed during follow-up. Ten/seventeen patients had antegrade ejaculation. Conclusions: Modified template unilateral PC-RPLND leads to very good oncological outcomes with decreased perioperative morbidity as well as better antegrade ejaculation rates. Low volume retroperitoneal disease seems to fit this procedure best.

1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 2700-2704 ◽  
Author(s):  
R J Motzer ◽  
J Sheinfeld ◽  
M Mazumdar ◽  
D F Bajorin ◽  
G J Bosl ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Two options cure nearly all patients with pathologic stage II nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCTs): two cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin, vinblastine, and bleomycin (PVB) or cisplatin, vinblastine, bleomycin, cyclophosphamide, and dactinomycin (VAB-6); or close observation with full treatment at relapse. Two cycles of etoposide plus cisplatin (EP) were given to selected patients with pathologic stage II NSGCT and high-volume nodal metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS All patients had pathologic stage II NSGCT with one or more of the following features found at retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND), suggesting a greater than 50% likelihood of relapse after observation alone: (1) any lymph node involved by tumor greater than 2 cm (stage N2b); (2) > or = six nodes involved with tumor (stage N2b); and (3) extranodal extension (stage N3). Two cycles of therapy were given at 21-day intervals; each cycle consisted of etoposide 100 mg/m2 plus cisplatin 20 mg/m2 per day given on days 1 to 5. RESULTS Fifty patients were treated with two cycles of EP. Treatment was well tolerated; five patients (10%) were admitted for nadir fever and none had grade II or greater neurologic, renal, or pulmonary toxicity. All 50 patients are alive and relapse-free at a median follow-up time of 35 months (range, 12 to 72). The follow-up duration has been > or = 2 years for 42 patients. CONCLUSION A treatment program that consists of two cycles of EP is effective in preventing relapses in patients with completely resected pathologic stage N2b and N3 NSGCT. The likelihood of relapse without adjuvant cisplatin-containing chemotherapy in this group has been shown to be greater than 50%. As has been demonstrated in patients with disseminated germ cell tumor (GCT), EP can be considered a therapeutic option in the adjuvant setting for completely resected N2b and N3 NSGCT.


2011 ◽  
pp. 28-35
Author(s):  
Giovanni Rosti ◽  
Ornella Carminati ◽  
Claudia Casanova ◽  
Giorgio Papiani

Germ cell tumors of the testes represent a unique paradigm of diseases which can be cured even in extremely advanced phase. Unfortunately, this makes them unique among adult solid tumors. Seminoma and non seminoma are relatively rare with approximatively 25,000 patients in Europe per year, but numbers are increasing world wide. Different strategies are needed depending on stage and prognostic scores. Seminoma is extremely sensitive to radiation therapy and chemotherapy, while all germ cell tumors show a very good response to chemotherapy. Clinical stage I seminoma is currently treated with radiation, single course carboplatin or surveillance policy. Clinical stage I non seminoma can also be approached with different strategies such as retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, observation or one-two courses of standard chemotherapy. Stage II seminoma may be treated with either radiation or chemotherapy, while for all advanced stages chemotherapy is mandatory. Since the mid-eighties PEB (Cisplatin, Etoposide and Bleomycin) is the regimen of choice and no other schedule has proved superior in terms of efficacy. Surgery on the residual disease is crucial to the whole strategy and should be performed or attempted in all cases. Consequently, the correct treatment strategy for these tumors does not depend only on the ability of a single physician, but on a skilled team specialized in this particular tumor. Second line therapies (VeIP, PEI, TIP) can cure 25%–40% of patients, but improved strategies for resistant tumors are desperately needed. High-dose chemotherapy has shown very good results in some studies while being less impressive in others. In any case, it should remain an option for relapsing patients and could be used in some cases of upfront chemotherapy in patients with slow marker decline, but this should only be considered in referring centers.


2020 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. e2420
Author(s):  
A. Shakir ◽  
L.G. Medina ◽  
A.N. Ashrafi ◽  
H. Thaker ◽  
A. Ghoreifi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document