scholarly journals Low-pressure endoscopy using the gel immersion method facilitates endoscopic hemostasis of duodenal diverticular bleeding

Endoscopy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroki Hayashi ◽  
Tomonori Yano ◽  
Kunihiko Oguro ◽  
Shiori Yoshimoto ◽  
Hiroaki Nomoto ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 06 (01) ◽  
pp. E36-E42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koki Kawanishi ◽  
Jun Kato ◽  
Tetsuhiro Kakimoto ◽  
Takeshi Hara ◽  
Takeichi Yoshida ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and study aims Re-commencement of bleeding (rebleeding) of colonic diverticula after endoscopic hemostasis is a clinical problem. This study aimed to examine whether endoscopic visibility of colonic diverticular bleeding affects the risk of rebleeding after endoscopic hemostasis. Patients and methods We performed a retrospective review of endoscopic images and medical charts of patients with colonic diverticular bleeding who underwent endoscopic hemostasis. Endoscopic visibility was classified into two types according to visibility of the source of bleeding; source invisibility due to bleeding or attached hematin (type 1), or endoscopically visible responsive vessels (type 2). Rebleeding rates within one year after initial hemostasis were examined. Results Of 93 patients with successful endoscopic hemostasis, 38 (41 %) showed type 1 visibility, while the remaining presented type 2. All patients received hemostasis with clipping, rebleeding developed in 20 patients (22 %). Type 1 visibility was more likely to be observed in patients with rebleeding (65 % vs. 34 %, P = 0.013). Multivariate analysis revealed that after endoscopic hemostasis, type 1 visibility (invisible source) was the only independent risk factor for colonic diverticular rebleeding (odds ratio, 3.05; 95 % confidence interval, 1.03 – 9.59, P = 0.044). Kaplan-Meier curve showed the cumulative incidence of rebleeding was significantly higher in patients with type 1 visibility than those with type 2 visibility (P = 0.0033, log-rank test) Conclusion Hemostasis by clipping for colonic diverticular bleeding without definite observation of the source of bleeding may not be sufficiently effective. Other hemostatic methods, including band ligation, should be considered when the source of bleeding is unclear.


Endoscopy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yohei Funayama ◽  
Tomonori Yano ◽  
Masafumi Kitamura ◽  
Hiroki Nagai ◽  
Shigeru Ono ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. CGast.S32421
Author(s):  
Yasumasa Matuso ◽  
Hiroshi Yasuda ◽  
Midori Suzuki ◽  
Shinya Ishigooka ◽  
Shun-Ichiro Ozawa ◽  
...  

Diverticulum of the horizontal portion of the duodenum is a rare cause of upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Since it is difficult to access the horizontal portion of the duodenum by standard upper GI endoscopy, only a very few cases of endoscopic hemostasis have been reported. Herein, we report a case of diverticular bleeding from the horizontal portion of the duodenum for which hemostasis was achieved using a small-caliber colonoscope, which has an insertion part designed with a passive-bending function/high-force transmission and a transparent tip hood.


Endoscopy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiromi Sekiguchi ◽  
Tomonori Yano ◽  
Shinnosuke Tokoro ◽  
Mizuho Iida ◽  
Shigeo Tano ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 379-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rintaro Hashimoto ◽  
Hidetaka Hamamoto ◽  
Tokuma Tanuma

Digestion ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Takeshi Okamoto ◽  
Kenji Nakamura ◽  
Kazuki Yamamoto ◽  
Takaaki Yoshimoto ◽  
Ayaka Takasu ◽  
...  

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Colonic diverticulosis increases with age, leading to a higher risk of colonic diverticular bleeding (CDB) in the elderly. As life expectancy continues to increase, the need for endoscopic hemostasis for CDB in the elderly can also be expected to increase. However, there have been no reports to date on the feasibility of endoscopic hemostasis for elderly CDB patients. Several recent studies have addressed the effectiveness of endoscopic band ligation (EBL) for CDB. In this study, we evaluate the safety and effectiveness of EBL in elderly CDB patients compared to younger CDB patients. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of consecutive patients treated with EBL for the first time at a tertiary referral center between March 2011 and November 2017. Patients were grouped according to age into those at least 75 years old (the Elderly) and those &#x3c;75 years old (the Nonelderly). Patient characteristics, technical success, and complications were compared between the two groups. <b><i>Results:</i></b> EBL was performed in 153 patients during the study period (49 Elderly patients and 104 Nonelderly patients). Elderly patients were less likely to be male (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001) and had lower hemoglobin levels on admission (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). Bleeding on the right side of the splenic flexure was observed more frequently in the Nonelderly (<i>p</i> = 0.002). Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and use of antithrombotic agents were significantly higher in the Elderly (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001 and <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001, respectively). Active bleeding tended to be observed more frequently in the Elderly (<i>p</i> = 0.054), while the difference was not significant. There were no significant differences in the shock index, procedure time, or units of packed red blood cells transfused between the 2 groups. No significant differences in the technical success rate (97.1 vs. 98%, <i>p</i> = 0.76), early rebleeding rate (10.2 vs. 14.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.47), or other complications (2 vs. 1%, <i>p</i> = 0.58) were observed. Perforation and abscess formation were not observed in either group. Female gender, left-sidedness, higher CCI, and lower hemoglobin level were all significantly more frequently observed in the Elderly on multiple logistic regression analysis. <b><i>Discussion/Conclusion:</i></b> EBL may be similarly safe and effective for the treatment of CDB in the elderly as in the nonelderly.


2020 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-34
Author(s):  
Kana Kawagishi ◽  
Kiyonori Kobayashi ◽  
Jun Kanazawa ◽  
Tomoya Saito ◽  
Yasuhiro Matsumoto ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document