6 Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring during Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery

Scientifica ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Harminder Singh ◽  
Richard W. Vogel ◽  
Robert M. Lober ◽  
Adam T. Doan ◽  
Craig I. Matsumoto ◽  
...  

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during endoscopic, endonasal approaches to the skull base is both feasible and safe. Numerous reports have recently emerged from the literature evaluating the efficacy of different neuromonitoring tests during endonasal procedures, making them relatively well-studied. The authors report on a comprehensive, multimodality approach to monitoring the functional integrity of at risk nervous system structures, including the cerebral cortex, brainstem, cranial nerves, corticospinal tract, corticobulbar tract, and the thalamocortical somatosensory system during endonasal surgery of the skull base. The modalities employed include electroencephalography, somatosensory evoked potentials, free-running and electrically triggered electromyography, transcranial electric motor evoked potentials, and auditory evoked potentials. Methodological considerations as well as benefits and limitations are discussed. The authors argue that, while individual modalities have their limitations, multimodality neuromonitoring provides a real-time, comprehensive assessment of nervous system function and allows for safer, more aggressive management of skull base tumors via the endonasal route.


2011 ◽  
Vol 69 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. ons64-ons76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Parthasarathy D Thirumala ◽  
Amin B. Kassasm ◽  
Miguel Habeych ◽  
Kelley Wichman ◽  
Yue-Fang Chang ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND: Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring, including upper- and lower-extremity somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), has been used to identify and prevent injury to neurovascular structures during conventional skull base surgery. The expanded endonasal approach (EEA) is a novel minimally invasive approach to skull base surgery. However, it carries the risk of injury to neurovascular structures, including the internal carotid artery, anterior cerebral artery, and cranial nerves. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of SSEP monitoring to predict and/or prevent neurovascular deficits during EEA to skull base surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 999 consecutive patients who had intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during EEA skull base surgery at our institution. A total of 976 patients had SSEP monitoring and a documented postoperative neurological examination. RESULTS: The incidence of changes in SSEP during the procedure was 20 of 976 (2%). The incidence of new postoperative neurological deficits was 5 of 976 (0.5%). The positive and negative predictive values of SSEPs during EEA to predict neurovascular deficits were 80.00% and 99.79%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative SSEP monitoring was able to identify impending risk to neurovascular structures to prevent permanent postoperative neurological deficits. We advocate a comprehensive approach to neurophysiological monitoring during EEAs, including SSEPs, spontaneous and triggered electromyography of the cranial nerves III through XII, brainstem auditory evoked potentials, and electroencephalogram, depending on the surgical approach and location of the neural structures at risk.


2014 ◽  
Vol 75 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
James Byrd ◽  
Eric Wang ◽  
Juan Fernandez-Miranda ◽  
Paul Gardner ◽  
Carl Snyderman

Skull Base ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (S 2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Theodore Schwartz ◽  
Seth Brown ◽  
Abtin Tabaee ◽  
Vijay Anand

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document