scholarly journals Coronal and Sagittal Plane Correction in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) using All Pedicle Screw versus Hybrid Instrumentation. A Systematic Review

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. s-0036-1582815-s-0036-1582815
Author(s):  
Wael Mostafa ◽  
Mohammad El-Sharkawi ◽  
Wael Koptan ◽  
Manal Darwish ◽  
Nasir A. Quraishi
2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (04) ◽  
pp. 550-553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sohail Rafi ◽  
Naseem Munshi ◽  
Asad Abbas ◽  
Rabia Hassan Shaikh ◽  
Imtiaz Hashmi

ABSTRACT Introduction: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is the most common type of scoliosis. A Cobb angle of 50° will progress beyond the age of spinal maturity. Surgery over bracing is advised at a Cobb angle above or equal to 50°. The aim of surgery is to bring the Cobb angle down below 50° to prevent reprogression as well as improve the quality of life. The objective of the study is to analyze the efficacy and significance in lifestyle improvement of pedicle screw-only fixation system versus the more common hybrid instrumentation system used for the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Materials and Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted involving two groups of patients were included in the study. One group was operated with pedicle screw-only method while the other with hybrid instrumentation system. The pre- and post-operative Cobb’s angles were taken across a follow-up of 4 years. An SRS-30 questionnaire was given in a yearly follow-up to assess the lifestyle improvement of the patient. Results: Pedicle screw-only method was significantly more effective in reducing Cobb’s angle (P = 0.0487). It was showed less loss of correction (P = 0.009) pedicle screw-only surgery was also better at reducing thoracic curves (P = 0.001). There seemed a better recovery time with pedicle screw surgery (P = 0.003). Conclusion: Pedicle screws are more effective and durable than hybrid systems at when treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.


Spine ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 291-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongjung J. Kim ◽  
Lawrence G. Lenke ◽  
Junghoon Kim ◽  
Keith H. Bridwell ◽  
Samuel K. Cho ◽  
...  

Spine ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (14) ◽  
pp. 1199-1208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alvin H. Crawford ◽  
Marios G. Lykissas ◽  
Xu Gao ◽  
Emily Eismann ◽  
Jennifer Anadio

2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 523-528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omer Karatoprak ◽  
Koray Unay ◽  
Mehmet Tezer ◽  
Cagatay Ozturk ◽  
Mehmet Aydogan ◽  
...  

Medicine ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 96 (27) ◽  
pp. e7337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming Luo ◽  
Ning Li ◽  
Mingkui Shen ◽  
Lei Xia

Spine ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melvin D. Helgeson ◽  
Suken A. Shah ◽  
Peter O. Newton ◽  
David H. Clements ◽  
Randal R. Betz ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 142-147
Author(s):  
RICARDO VIEIRA TELES FILHO ◽  
GUILHERME DE MATOS ABE ◽  
BRUNO AUGUSTO EVANGELISTA EMILIORELLI SILVA ◽  
NILO CARRIJO MELO ◽  
VINÍCIO NUNES NASCIMENTO ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Objective In 2003, Mazda et al. introduced a new device for surgical correction of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) called sublaminar bands (SB). The reduction principle that SBs use is posteromedial spinal translation, similar to Luque’s wiring, but using polyester bands. Methods We performed a systematic review of the literature on this subject, evaluating the technique in terms of coronal correction, sagittal correction, bleeding, mean surgical time, loss of correction, infection, pseudoarthrosis, and neurological and other complications. The total search resulted in 14 articles published over the last 10 years. We found that the use of SBs in hybrid AIS correction instrumentations provides an average correction of 69% in the frontal plane, a 5° increase in thoracic kyphosis (average increase of 55%), overall complications of 4.5%, and no neurological complications were reported in any of the studies analyzed.. The mean blood loss was 682.5 mL and the mean surgical time was 228.6 minutes. Conclusions We conclude that the literature suggests that this instrumentation is safe, allows good correction in the frontal plane and great correction in the sagittal plane. As for complications, mean surgical time, and blood loss, their averages are lower than those of other constructions used for AIS. Level of evidence IIA; Systematic review.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document