The impact of the Point-spread-function (PSF) reconstruction on the response assessment in the Interim-PET (iPET) in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
TW Georgi ◽  
L Kurch ◽  
D Hasenclever ◽  
D Körholz ◽  
O Sabri ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 636 ◽  
pp. A78 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Schmitz ◽  
J.-L. Starck ◽  
F. Ngole Mboula ◽  
N. Auricchio ◽  
J. Brinchmann ◽  
...  

Context. Future weak lensing surveys, such as the Euclid mission, will attempt to measure the shapes of billions of galaxies in order to derive cosmological information. These surveys will attain very low levels of statistical error, and systematic errors must be extremely well controlled. In particular, the point spread function (PSF) must be estimated using stars in the field, and recovered with high accuracy. Aims. The aims of this paper are twofold. Firstly, we took steps toward a nonparametric method to address the issue of recovering the PSF field, namely that of finding the correct PSF at the position of any galaxy in the field, applicable to Euclid. Our approach relies solely on the data, as opposed to parametric methods that make use of our knowledge of the instrument. Secondly, we studied the impact of imperfect PSF models on the shape measurement of galaxies themselves, and whether common assumptions about this impact hold true in an Euclid scenario. Methods. We extended the recently proposed resolved components analysis approach, which performs super-resolution on a field of under-sampled observations of a spatially varying, image-valued function. We added a spatial interpolation component to the method, making it a true 2-dimensional PSF model. We compared our approach to PSFEx, then quantified the impact of PSF recovery errors on galaxy shape measurements through image simulations. Results. Our approach yields an improvement over PSFEx in terms of the PSF model and on observed galaxy shape errors, though it is at present far from reaching the required Euclid accuracy. We also find that the usual formalism used for the propagation of PSF model errors to weak lensing quantities no longer holds in the case of an Euclid-like PSF. In particular, different shape measurement approaches can react differently to the same PSF modeling errors.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (17) ◽  
pp. 2811
Author(s):  
Yongpeng Dai ◽  
Tian Jin ◽  
Yongkun Song ◽  
Shilong Sun ◽  
Chen Wu

Radar images suffer from the impact of sidelobes. Several sidelobe-suppressing methods including the convolutional neural network (CNN)-based one has been proposed. However, the point spread function (PSF) in the radar images is sometimes spatially variant and affects the performance of the CNN. We propose the spatial-variant convolutional neural network (SV-CNN) aimed at this problem. It will also perform well in other conditions when there are spatially variant features. The convolutional kernels of the CNN can detect motifs with some distinctive features and are invariant to the local position of the motifs. This makes the convolutional neural networks widely used in image processing fields such as image recognition, handwriting recognition, image super-resolution, and semantic segmentation. They also perform well in radar image enhancement. However, the local position invariant character might not be good for radar image enhancement, when features of motifs (also known as the point spread function in the radar imaging field) vary with the positions. In this paper, we proposed an SV-CNN with spatial-variant convolution kernels (SV-CK). Its function is illustrated through a special application of enhancing the radar images. After being trained using radar images with position-codings as the samples, the SV-CNN can enhance the radar images. Because the SV-CNN reads information of the local position contained in the position-coding, it performs better than the conventional CNN. The advance of the proposed SV-CNN is tested using both simulated and real radar images.


2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (11) ◽  
pp. 944-952 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huibin Wang ◽  
Rong Zhang ◽  
Zhe Chen ◽  
Lizhong Xu ◽  
Jie Shen

2020 ◽  
Vol 128 (7) ◽  
pp. 1036-1040 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. G. Stsepuro ◽  
G. K. Krasin ◽  
M. S. Kovalev ◽  
V. N. Pestereva

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document