System Integration: Managing Complexity to Advance Health Care Value

NEJM Catalyst ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark A. Keroack
2016 ◽  
Vol 94 (2) ◽  
pp. 314-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
WILLIAM B. WEEKS ◽  
GREGORY R. KOTZBAUER ◽  
JAMES N. WEINSTEIN

2002 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 67-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Surrey M. Walton ◽  
Philip E. Graves ◽  
Peter R. Mueser ◽  
Jay K. Dow

2013 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Clinton MacKinney ◽  
Keith J. Mueller ◽  
Thomas Vaughn ◽  
Xi Zhu

2018 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shivank Garg ◽  
Noelle L. Williams ◽  
Andrew Ip ◽  
Adam P. Dicker

Digital health constitutes a merger of both software and hardware technology with health care delivery and management, and encompasses a number of domains, from wearable devices to artificial intelligence, each associated with widely disparate interaction and data collection models. In this review, we focus on the landscape of the current integration of digital health technology in cancer care by subdividing digital health technologies into the following sections: connected devices, digital patient information collection, telehealth, and digital assistants. In these sections, we give an overview of the potential clinical impact of such technologies as they pertain to key domains, including patient education, patient outcomes, quality of life, and health care value. We performed a search of PubMed ( www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed ) and www.ClinicalTrials.gov for numerous terms related to digital health technologies, including digital health, connected devices, smart devices, wearables, activity trackers, connected sensors, remote monitoring, electronic surveys, electronic patient-reported outcomes, telehealth, telemedicine, artificial intelligence, chatbot, and digital assistants. The terms health care and cancer were appended to the previously mentioned terms to filter results for cancer-specific applications. From these results, studies were included that exemplified use of the various domains of digital health technologies in oncologic care. Digital health encompasses the integration of a vast array of technologies with health care, each associated with varied methods of data collection and information flow. Integration of these technologies into clinical practice has seen applications throughout the spectrum of care, including cancer screening, on-treatment patient management, acute post-treatment follow-up, and survivorship. Implementation of these systems may serve to reduce costs and workflow inefficiencies, as well as to improve overall health care value, patient outcomes, and quality of life.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (7) ◽  
pp. e338-e339
Author(s):  
Jean-David Zeitoun ◽  
Philippe Ravaud

2015 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
pp. 317-323
Author(s):  
Clara Carpeggiani ◽  
Alberto Macerata ◽  
Maria Aurora Morales

SummaryObjectives:the aim of this study was to report a ten years experience in the electronic medical record (EMR) use. An estimated 80% of healthcare transactions are still paper-based.Methods:an EMR system was built at the end of 1998 in an Italian tertiary care center to achieve total integration among different human and instrumental sources, eliminating paper-based medical records. Physicians and nurses who used EMR system reported their opinions. In particular the hospital activity supported electronically, regarding 4,911 adult patients hospitalized in the 2004- 2008 period, was examined.Results:the final EMR product integrated multimedia document (text, images, signals). EMR presented for the most part advantages and was well adopted by the personnel. Appropriateness evaluation was also possible for some procedures. Some disadvantages were encountered, such as start-up costs, long time required to learn how to use the tool, little to no standardization between systems and the EMR technology.Conclusion:the EMR is a strategic goal for clinical system integration to allow a better health care quality. The advantages of the EMR overcome the disadvantages, yielding a positive return on investment to health care organization.


2020 ◽  
Vol 89 (2) ◽  
pp. 289-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamil Hanna ◽  
Zaid Haddadin ◽  
Joseph Sakran ◽  
Muhammad Zeeshan ◽  
Samer Asmar ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 150 (3) ◽  
pp. 178-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Riley ◽  
Mark Doherty ◽  
Kailey Love

1987 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 11???18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas N. Gilmore ◽  
Mary Ann Peter

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document