Huntsman at Home, an Oncology Hospital at Home Program

NEJM Catalyst ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Titchener ◽  
Lorinda A. Coombs ◽  
Kimberly Dumas ◽  
Anna C. Beck ◽  
John H. Ward ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 176 (11) ◽  
pp. 1724 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce Leff ◽  
Tacara Soones ◽  
Linda DeCherrie

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Crystal Min Siu Chua ◽  
Stephanie Qianwen Ko ◽  
Yi Feng Lai ◽  
Yee Wei Lim ◽  
Shefaly Shorey

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shabana Kapadia ◽  
Avi Parush ◽  
Sonya Kung ◽  
Edoye Porbeni

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 23 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Lippert ◽  
S. Semmens ◽  
L. Tacey ◽  
T. Rent ◽  
K. Defoe ◽  
...  

BackgroundThe treatment of children with cancer is associated with significant burden for the entire family. Frequent clinic visits and extended hospital stays can negatively affect quality of life for children and their families.Methods Here, we describe the development of a Hospital at Home program (H@H) that delivers therapy to pediatric hematology, oncology, and blood and marrow transplant (bmt) patients in their homes. The services provided include short infusions of chemotherapy, supportive-care interventions, antibiotics, post-chemotherapy hydration, and teaching.Results From 2013 to 2015, the H@H program served 136 patients, making 1701 home visits, for patients mainly between the ages of 1 and 4 years. Referrals came from oncology in 82% of cases, from hematology in 11%, and from bmt in 7%. Since inception of the program, no adverse events have been reported. Family surveys suggested less disruption in daily routines and appreciation of specialized care by hematology and oncology nurses. Staff surveys highlighted a perceived benefit of H@H in contributing to early discharge of patients by supporting out-of-hospital monitoring and teaching.Conclusions The development of a H@H program dedicated to the pediatric hematology, oncology, or bmt patient appears feasible. Our pilot program offers a potential contribution to improvement in patient quality of life and in cost–benefit for parents and the health care system.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7000-7000
Author(s):  
Kathi Mooney ◽  
Karen Titchener ◽  
Benjamin Haaland ◽  
Lorinda Adaire Coombs ◽  
Brock O Neil ◽  
...  

7000 Background: Unplanned hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits are common during cancer care. Providing acute hospital level care at home may add value by decreasing hospital and ED use. We conducted the first evaluation of an oncology Hospital-at-Home program, Huntsman at Home (H@H). Methods: The Huntsman Cancer Institute began H@H services in 2018 and accepts referral of cancer patients for acute-medical or post-surgical care at home. Patients are admitted who require continued acute level medical care after hospitalization or have emergent unstable symptoms related to treatment or disease progression that would otherwise require ED evaluation or hospitalization. Prospectively, patients referred to H@H from 8/2018 through 10/2019 were compared to a usual care comparison group (UC) drawn concurrently from patients living within the Salt Lake City metropolitan area who qualified for admission to H@H, but lived outside the service zip codes. Probability of H@H enrollment propensity scores were constructed via random forest from patient descriptors and health care utilization at admission. We used an intent-to-treat approach for analysis. Primary outcomes were hospitalizations, length of stay (LOS), ED visits and cumulative charges over 30 and 90 days post admission to either group. Comparisons were made by generalized linear models, stratified by tertiles of H@H vs. UC propensity score. Results: 367 patients, 169 H@H and 198 UC, were evaluated. The average age was 62 yrs, 85% were Caucasian, and 77% had stage IV cancer. Propensity score distributions were overlapping, demonstrating group comparability. A variety of cancers were represented; the most common being colon, gynecologic, prostate and lung cancers. Compared to UC, H@H patients were more likely to be female (61% vs 43%) and during the month prior to admission, showed a trend towards longer LOS if hospitalized (6.7 vs 5.5 days). During the first 30 days after admission, propensity stratified comparisons showed H@H patients with lower hospital LOS (mean reduction 1.19 days, p=0.022), 56% lower odds of unplanned hospitalizations (OR 0.44, p=0.001), 45% lower odds of ED visits (OR 0.55, p=0.037) and 50% lower cumulative charges (mean ratio 0.50, p<0.001) compared to UC. Results over 90 days were similarly robust. Conclusions: In the first reported trial of an adult oncology Hospital at Home program, there was strong evidence for reduced hospitalizations, ED visits, and cost. Oncology Hospital at Home programs show promise for increased patient-centered care while simultaneously improving value.


2019 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 588-595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abraham A. Brody ◽  
Alicia I. Arbaje ◽  
Linda V. DeCherrie ◽  
Alex D. Federman ◽  
Bruce Leff ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Warren Gavin ◽  
Joshua Rager ◽  
Jason Russ ◽  
Kavitha Subramoney ◽  
Areeba Kara

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document