scholarly journals Exemestane for Breast-Cancer Prevention in Postmenopausal Women

2011 ◽  
Vol 365 (14) ◽  
pp. 1361-1361
2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1517-1517
Author(s):  
T. Bao ◽  
S. A. Slater ◽  
A. Blackford ◽  
S. C. Jeter ◽  
L. Wright ◽  
...  

1517 Background: When used in the adjuvant setting, aromatase inhibitors (AIs) reduce the incidence of contralateral breast cancer and are therefore under investigation for primary breast cancer prevention. Statins hold promise for chemoprevention based on preclinical and epidemiological data. Adding statin to AI has the potential to enhance breast cancer prevention and to protect women from AI-related side effects. Prior to initiating a chemoprevention trial of combination therapy, we evaluated the potential for pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction between anastrozole and simvastatin in postmenopausal women taking adjuvant anastrozole to ensure that the combination will not influence anastrozole concentration or affect its ability to reduce estrogen. Methods: Postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, stage 0-III breast cancer who had been on adjuvant anastrozole (1 mg/day) for at least 30 days were prescribed 14 days of simvastatin (40 mg/day). We collected serum at baseline (anastrozole alone) and after 14 days of simvastatin initiation (combination therapy). Anastrozole and hydroxyanastrozole, its hydroxylated metabolite, concentrations were determined using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay. Estrogen concentrations will be determined using radio-immunoassay. Significant change in anastrozole was predetermined to be greater than a 30% decrease in concentrations. Percent changes from baseline in anastrozole and hydroxyanastrozole were evaluated using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Results: From December 2006 to September 2008, 11 women (10 Caucasian, 1 Black, all reported non-Hispanic with a mean age of 60 yrs [range 51–69]) were enrolled in the study. Of these women, nine had evaluable anastrozole concentrations. After 14 days of simvastatin, there were nonsignificant changes in anastrozole (median percentage difference = 10.1% [-13.5%, 38.4%], p = 0.36) and hydroxyanastrozole (median percentage difference = -3.0% [-19.1%, 11.2%], p = 0.65). Estrogen data will be available for presentation. Conclusions: Simvastatin is unlikely to alter the pharmacokinetics of anastrozole in a clinically meaningful way. Combination studies to assess chemopreventive properties of the combination are planned. [Table: see text]


PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. e0198641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Devon J. Boyne ◽  
Will D. King ◽  
Darren R. Brenner ◽  
John B. McIntyre ◽  
Kerry S. Courneya ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (8) ◽  
pp. 845-854 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luisa María Sánchez-Zamorano ◽  
Lourdes Flores-Luna ◽  
Angélica Angeles-Llerenas ◽  
Carolina Ortega-Olvera ◽  
Eduardo Lazcano-Ponce ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 110-112
Author(s):  
Rajendra P. Kedar ◽  
Thomas H. Bourne ◽  
Trevor J. Powles ◽  
William P. Collins ◽  
Susan E. Ashley ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1565-1565
Author(s):  
Mia Sorkin ◽  
Donna Lapolt ◽  
Lajos Pusztai ◽  
Erin Wysong Hofstatter

1565 Background: Exemestane has recently been identified as an effective breast cancer chemoprevention agent. This drug may be more appealing to patients than tamoxifen or raloxifene, since it does not increase the risks of thrombosis, cataracts and uterine cancer. Poor patient acceptance of tamoxifen and raloxifene as chemoprevention is well-documented but patient acceptance rates for exemestane have not been reported. The goal of this study was to assess exemestane use in a breast cancer prevention clinic. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted to capture patient characteristics, medical history and chemoprevention uptake of all postmenopausal women presenting to the Yale Breast Cancer Prevention Clinic from November 2011-November 2012. Descriptive statistics are presented. Results: Fifty-six postmenopausal women deemed eligible for initiation of chemoprevention were seen during the study timeframe, with a mean age of 58 (range 42-79). Risk categories included: 22 women (39%) diagnosed with breast atypia, 7 with LCIS (12%), 4 with prior DCIS (7%), 41 with family history of breast cancer (73%), and 8 women with a deleterious BRCA 1 or 2 mutation (14%). 22 (39%) of these women had osteopenia or osteoporosis. Of all eligible women, 13 opted to start a chemoprevention medication (23%); 8 of whom opted for raloxifene, 1 for tamoxifen and 4 for exemestane. While exemestane comprised 30.7% (4/13) of chemoprevention medication uptake, only 4 of 56 women eligible for chemoprevention decided to take exemestane (7%). Conclusions: Chemoprevention uptake rates of postmenopausal women in the setting of a breast cancer prevention clinic are higher (23%) than those reported in the general population, but remain low overall. Uptake of exemestane appears lower than that of raloxifene but higher than tamoxifen. A large proportion of postmenopausal women (39%) have osteopenia or osteoporosis which limits exemestane uptake in a breast cancer prevention setting.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document