Early Modern Women’s Letter Writing, 1450–1700

Keyword(s):  
Parergon ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 250-251
Author(s):  
Pamela Sharpe
Keyword(s):  

2002 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 1183
Author(s):  
Carrie F. Klaus ◽  
James Daybell
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yulia But

This review examines a collection of sixteen research papers by a group of renowned Russian and non-Russian specialists in early modern history. The authors try to formulate the essence of the all-European ideal of noble education and to outline the educational trajectories and strategies of the nobility both from Russia and different parts of Europe. The papers refer to a considerable number of archival sources and employ relevant methods and original approaches. The authors agree that during the period in question, for a well-educated representative of the European nobility, it was important to be able to communicate with those of equal standing, which entailed following social niceties and the art of letter-writing. As for academic knowledge, a nobleman was expected to have a general notion of various domains, including new disciplines, such as fortification, cameralism, mining, agriculture, etc. The reviewer criticises the scholarly apparatus of the publication and its design.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-90
Author(s):  
Anna Swärdh

This essay examines the supplicatory letter the Swedish-born Helena, marchioness of Northampton, addressed to Thomas Radcliffe, third earl of Sussex, in 1576 or 1577, hoping he would help her regain access to Elizabeth I. The essay situates the letter within the early modern patronage system and the court environment, but foremost within the field of early modern letter-writing in general, and the supplicatory letter in particular. The essay shows how a number of rhetorical strategies, designed to inspire pity and benevolence mainly through ethos and pathos, are employed to create positions for both supplicant and addressee. In this way, the letter reaches the desired goal of regaining royal presence. By looking at the letter through the frames of early modern letter-writing and more general rhetorical practise, the essay points to a tension between the letter’s stated sentiment of “utter confusion” and its highly formalised expression, indicative of the letter’s rhetorical situation and especially of the constraints related to its sender’s social status. The letter is transcribed in an appendix.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document