scholarly journals In Situ Out-of-Plane Testing of As-Built and Retrofitted Unreinforced Masonry Walls

2014 ◽  
Vol 140 (6) ◽  
pp. 04014022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hossein Derakhshan ◽  
Dmytro Dizhur ◽  
Michael C. Griffith ◽  
Jason M. Ingham
2013 ◽  
Vol 57 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pawan Agnihotri ◽  
Vaibhav Singhal ◽  
Durgesh C. Rai

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 243-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Brando ◽  
Davide Rapone ◽  
Enrico Spacone ◽  
Matt S. O'Banion ◽  
Michael J. Olsen ◽  
...  

This paper documents and analyzes the seismic behavior of unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings that were damaged by the 2015 Gorkha earthquake in Nepal, and reports on the performance of palaces, giving an overview on the failures suffered by significant examples of these monumental buildings. Field reconnaissance was completed through both rapid, in-situ visual assessment and state-of-the-art procedures utilizing light detection and ranging (lidar) and virtual reality (VR) technologies. Both the visual and virtual assessments were compared for 20 structures and were generally consistent; however, the virtual assessment process enabled detection of damage that could not be captured or was difficult to distinguish in the field observations. Further, both in-plane and out-of-plane mechanisms were analyzed and attributed to specific structural deficiencies that usually characterize poorly detailed masonry buildings. Moreover, wall overturning was correlated with the peculiarities of the pseudo-accelerations and rocking response spectra of the earthquake.


Structures ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 88-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Derakhshan ◽  
W. Lucas ◽  
P. Visintin ◽  
M.C. Griffith

Structures ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. 2431-2447
Author(s):  
Lang-Zi Chang ◽  
Francesco Messali ◽  
Rita Esposito

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-234
Author(s):  
Saeed Pourfalah ◽  
Demetrios M Cotsovos

Published experimental work reveals that the out-of-plane behaviour of unreinforced masonry walls under impact loading can be significantly enhanced through the use of engineered cementitious composite layers fully bonded to the surface of the masonry. The disadvantage of this method is associated with the localised cracking exhibited by the engineered cementitious composite layer close to the joints forming between bricks. This cracking is associated with the bond developing between the masonry and the engineered cementitious composite layer and does not allow the latter layer to achieve its full potential, thus resulting in its premature failure. In an attempt to address this problem, a series of drop-weight tests were carried on masonry prismatic specimens strengthened with a layer of engineered cementitious composite partially bonded to the surface of the masonry acting in tension. The latter prismatic specimens consist of a stack of bricks connected with mortar joints. The specimens are considered to provide a simplistic representation of a vertical strip of a masonry wall subjected to out-of-plane actions associated with impact or blast loading. Analysis of the test data reveals that under impact loading, the specimens retrofitted with partially bonded engineered cementitious composite layers can exhibit a more ductile performance compared to that exhibited by the same specimens when strengthened with fully bonded layers of engineered cementitious composite. This is attributed to the fact that along its unbonded length, the engineered cementitious composite layer is subjected to purely uniaxial tension (free from any interaction with the surface of the masonry), allowing for the development of multiple uniformly distributed fine cracks.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document