Discussion of “Differential Movement in Composite Load-Bearing Masonry Walls”

1980 ◽  
Vol 106 (9) ◽  
pp. 1996-1997
Author(s):  
Subhash C. Anand
1979 ◽  
Vol 105 (7) ◽  
pp. 1277-1288
Author(s):  
Clayford T. Grimm ◽  
David W. Fowler

1972 ◽  
Vol 98 (2) ◽  
pp. 522-526
Author(s):  
Donald F. Meinheit ◽  
John Springfield
Keyword(s):  

2003 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 795-806 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Liu ◽  
J L Dawe

An analytical technique was developed and encoded for computer application to study the behaviour of concrete masonry load-bearing walls under various loading conditions. Both geometrical and material nonlinearities to account for the moment magnification effect and the degradation of material stiffness are included in the development. Effects of vertical reinforcing steel, masonry tensile cracking, and compressive crushing are included directly in the moment–curvature relationship, which is used in the determination of element stiffnesses at successive load increments. A parametric study was conducted following verification of the analytical model by comparing results with experimental test data. Effective flexural rigidity (EIeff) values at failure were obtained analytically and compared with values suggested in the Canadian masonry code CSA-S304.1-M94. It was concluded that CSA-S304.1-M94 tends to underestimate EIeff values for reinforced walls and thus leads to a conservative design over a range of parameters. Based on approximately 500 computer model tests, a lower bound bilinear limit for the effective rigidity of reinforced masonry walls was established. This limit is believed to provide an accurate and realistic estimate of EIeff.Key words: walls, load bearing, masonry, analytical, nonlinear, rigidity, stress–strain, moment–curvature.


2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (7) ◽  
pp. 449-462
Author(s):  
A.T. Vermeltfoort ◽  
D.R.W. Martens

The results of five experimental test series on masonry walls supported by reinforced concrete beams or slabs are reported and compared to theoretical predictions of the load bearing capacity. The experiments were performed on deep masonry beams built with respectively calcium silicate and clay brick. Investigated parameters were: position of the supports, concrete beam-masonry interface, concrete beam stiffness, type of loading, and height of masonry wall and concrete beam. Based on literature, the method proposed by Davies and Ahmed as well as the method according to Eurocode 6 were used to estimate the load bearing capacity of the tested masonry walls supported by concrete beams. The method of Davies and Ahmed allows for the determination of the stresses and stress resultants in the masonry. The analysis shows that near the support an inclined compressive force acts at the bed joint, which means that a shear-compression stress state exists in the bed joint. Strength evaluation has been carried out using the Mann-Müller criterion that is adopted in Eurocode 6. Based on the test results, it may be concluded that both methods yield conservative values of the load bearing capacity, as could be expected. Before cracking a linear elastic behavior was observed, while after cracking a strut-and-tie model may be applied. To develop more accurate design models, it is recommended to investigate the post-cracking behavior in more detail.


2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 2647-2670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorenzo Billi ◽  
Francesco Laudicina ◽  
Luca Salvatori ◽  
Maurizio Orlando ◽  
Paolo Spinelli

Author(s):  
Clayton Edward James Pettit ◽  
Erum Mohsin ◽  
Carlos Cruz-Noguez ◽  
Alaa E Elwi

Slender, load-bearing masonry walls with slenderness ratios (h/t) greater than 30 are required to be designed as pinned-pinned elements as per North American provisions for masonry, CSA S304-14 (2019) and TMS 402-16 (2016). This provision neglects the contribution of the reactive stiffness of the foundation to the strength of the wall and its effect on the redistribution of bending moments along its height. Eight full-scale masonry walls built with different degrees of base stiffness and tested under an eccentric axial load. Results from the tests showed an increased load-bearing capacity and decreased deflections with increased rotational base stiffness. Experimental data was used to determine key design parameters including the effective flexural rigidity and the moment distribution along the height of the walls. Comparing values of effective flexural rigidity determined from experimental results to code provisions, it was found both codes tend to underestimate the effective flexural rigidity of the walls.


2016 ◽  
pp. 991-998 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Parisi ◽  
C. Balestrieri ◽  
D. Asprone

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document