State‐resolved inelastic collisions of single rotational, fine‐structure, and Λ doublet levels of NH(A 3Π) with helium: A combined experimental and theoretical study

In this work, a theoretical study of the electronic and the optical properties of a new family of strain-free GaAs/AlGaAs quantum dots (QDs) obtained by AlGaAs nanohole filling is presented. The considered model consists of solving the three-dimensional effective-mass Schrödinger equation, thus providing a complete description of the neutral and charged complex excitons’ fine structure. The QD size effect on carrier confinement energies, wave functions, and s-p splitting is studied. The direct Coulomb interaction impact on the calculated s and p states’ transition energies is investigated. The behaviour of the binding energy of neutral and charged excitons (X− and X+) and biexciton XX versus QD height is studied. The addition of the correlation effect allows to explain the nature of biexcitons often observed experimentally.

Download Full-text

Inelastic Collisions between Excited Alkali Atoms and Molecules. VIII. 62P1/2–62P3/2 Mixing and Quenching in Mixtures of Rubidium with H2, HD, D2, N2, CH4, and CD4

Canadian Journal of Physics ◽

10.1139/p73-033 ◽

1973 ◽

Vol 51 (3) ◽

pp. 257-265 ◽

Cited By ~ 18

Author(s):

I. N. Siara ◽

L. Krause

Keyword(s):

Fine Structure ◽

Cross Sections ◽

Ground State ◽

Inelastic Collisions ◽

Fluorescent Intensity ◽

Rubidium Vapor ◽

Sensitized Fluorescence ◽

Molecular Gases ◽

Alkali Atoms ◽

Intensity Ratios

Excitation transfer between the 62P fine-structure substates in rubidium, induced in inelastic collisions with ground-state molecules, has been studied using techniques of sensitized fluorescence. Rubidium vapor in mixtures with various molecular gases was irradiated with each component of the 2P rubidium doublet in turn, and measurements of sensitized-to-resonance fluorescent intensity ratios yielded the following mixing cross sections Q12(2P1/2 → 2P3/2) and Q21(2P1/2 ← 2P3/2), as well as effective quenching cross sections Q1X(2P1/2 → 2XJ″) and Q2X(2P3/2 → 2XJ″). For collisions with H2: Q12(2P1/2 → 2P3/2) = (41 ± 5) Å2; Q21(2P1/2 ← 2P3/2) = (26 ± 3) Å2; Q1X(2P1/2 → 2XJ″) = (36 ± 9) Å2; Q2X(2P3/2 → 2XJ″) = (31 ± 8) Å2. For HD: Q12 = (42 ± 5) Å2; Q21 = (27 ± 4) Å2; Q1X = (47 ± 13) Å2; Q2X = (38 ± 10) Å2. For D2: Q12 = (42 ± 5) Å2; Q21 = (27 ± 4) Å2; Q1X = (28 ± 8) Å2; Q2X = (21 ± 7) Å2. For N2: Q12 = (107 ± 15) Å2; Q21 = (70 ± 10) Å2; Q1X = (128 ± 44) Å2; Q2X = (126 ± 33) Å2. For CH4: Q12 = (38 ± 6) Å2; Q21 = (24 ± 3) Å2; Q1X = (129 ± 41) Å2; Q2X = (114 ± 37) Å2. For CD4: Q12 = (52 ± 7) Å2; Q21 = (34 ± 5) Å2; Q1X = (82 ± 30) Å2; Q2X = (76 ± 22) Å2. An analysis of these results suggests the possibility of resonances with various molecular rotational and vibrational transitions.

Download Full-text

Theoretical study of inelastic collisions of hot atoms

Chemical Physics Letters ◽

10.1016/0009-2614(71)80365-2 ◽

1971 ◽

Vol 11 (2) ◽

pp. 229-232 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

M. Baer

Keyword(s):

Theoretical Study ◽

Inelastic Collisions

Download Full-text