Analysis of Gender Disparity in US and Canadian Radiology Residency Programs

Author(s):  
Sami Adham ◽  
Frank J. Rybicki ◽  
Mary C. Mahoney ◽  
Charlotte J. Yong-Hing ◽  
Faisal Khosa
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Facundo N. Diaz ◽  
Marina Ulla

Abstract Background Diagnostic radiology residency programs pursuits as main objectives of the development of diagnostic capabilities and written communication skills to answer clinicians’ questions of referring clinicians. There has been also an increasing focus on competencies, rather than just education inputs. Then, to show ongoing professional development is necessary for a system to assess and document resident’s competence in these areas. Therefore, we propose the implementation of an informatics tool to objectively assess resident’s progress in developing diagnostics and reporting skills. We expect to found decreased preliminary report-final report variability within the course of each year of the residency program. Results We analyzed 12,162 evaluations from 32 residents (8 residents per year in a 4-year residency program) in a 7-month period. 73.96% of these evaluations belong to 2nd-year residents. We chose two indicators to study the evolution of evaluations: the total of discrepancies over the total of preliminary reports (excluding score 0) and the total of likely to be clinically significant discrepancies (scores 2b, 3b, and 4b) over the total of preliminary reports (excluding score 0). With the analysis of these two indicators over the evaluations of 2nd-year residents, we found a slight decrease in the value of the first indicator and relative stable behavior of the second one. Conclusions This tool is useful for objective assessment of reporting skill of radiology residents. It can provide an opportunity for continuing medical education with case-based learning from those cases with clinically significant discrepancies between the preliminary and the final report.


2020 ◽  
pp. 084653711989366
Author(s):  
Joseph Yang ◽  
Danny Jomaa ◽  
Omar Islam ◽  
Benedetto Mussari ◽  
Corinne Laverty ◽  
...  

Purpose: Implementing competency-based medical education in diagnostic radiology residencies will change the paradigm of learning and assessment for residents. The objective of this study is to evaluate medical student perceptions of competency-based medical education in diagnostic radiology programs and how this may affect their decision to pursue a career in diagnostic radiology. Methods: First-, second-, and third-year medical students at a Canadian university were invited to complete a 14-question survey containing a mix of multiple choice, yes/no, Likert scale, and open-ended questions. This aimed to collect information on students’ understanding and perceptions of competency-based medical education and how the transition to competency-based medical education would factor into their decision to enter a career in diagnostic radiology. Results: The survey was distributed to 300 medical students and received 63 responses (21%). Thirty-seven percent of students had an interest in pursuing diagnostic radiology that ranged from interested to committed and 46% reported an understanding of competency-based medical education and its learning approach. The implementation of competency-based medical education in diagnostic radiology programs was reported to be a positive factor by 70% of students and almost all reported that breaking down residency into measurable milestones and required case exposure was beneficial. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that medical students perceive competency-based medical education to be a beneficial change to diagnostic radiology residency programs. The changes accompanying the transition to competency-based medical education were favored by students and factored into their residency decision-making.


Author(s):  
Lindsay E. Kuo ◽  
Heather G. Lyu ◽  
Molly P. Jarman ◽  
Nelya Melnitchouk ◽  
Gerard M. Doherty ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Bahar Mansoori ◽  
Pedram Golnari ◽  
Arghavan Sharifi ◽  
Pegah Khoshpouri ◽  
Hamid Chalian ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 314-317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allen S. Prober ◽  
Eric Ledermann ◽  
Alexander Norbash ◽  
William A. Mehan ◽  
Harprit S. Bedi

2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth B Williamson ◽  
Valerie P Jackson ◽  
Lois A Shuman ◽  
Michael D Stiefel ◽  
Richard B Gunderman

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 1163-1171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farzaneh Ghazi Sherbaf ◽  
Doris D.M. Lin ◽  
David M. Yousem

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 968-973 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary F. Wood ◽  
M.P. Lungren ◽  
C.M. Cinelli ◽  
B. Johnson ◽  
A. Prater ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document