Use of computed tomographic scans for patients with minor head injury

2002 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 348-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeff Bazarian
Neurosurgery ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 449-453 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tony Feuerman ◽  
Phillip Ashley Wackym ◽  
George F. Gade ◽  
Donald P. Becker

Neurosurgery ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 344-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca W. Rimel ◽  
Bruno Giordani ◽  
Jeffrey T. Barth ◽  
John A. Jane

Abstract We have divided head injury into three categories based on the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) (severe, 3–8; moderate, 9–12; and minor, 13–15). In a previous report, we described significant disability after minor head injury. The present report describes 199 patients with moderate head injury, 159 of whom underwent follow–up examinations at 3 months. In contrast to patients with minor head injury, half as many were students (17%) and twice as many were intoxicated (53%). Seventy–five patients were studied with computed tomographic (CT) scanning; 30% of the scans were negative and 31% showed a space–occupying mass. As reported by Gennarelli et al. in patients with severe head injuries, those with moderate head injury and subdural hematoma had a very poor outcome: 65% died or were severely disabled and none made a good recovery as measured by the Glasgow Outcome Scale. At 3 months, 38% of the moderate head injury patients had made a good recovery compared with 75% of the minor head injury patients. Within the good recovery category, however, there was much disability (headache, 93%; memory difficulties, 90% difficulties with activities of daily living, 87%), and only 7% of the patients were asymptomatic. The Halstead–Reitan Neuropsychological Battery in an unselected subset (n = 32) showed significant deficits on all test measures. Sixty–six per cent of the patients previously employed had not returned to work, compared to 33% of the minor head injury patients. The major predictors of unemployment after minor head injury were premorbid characteristics (age, education, and socio–economic status). In contrast, all predictors in moderate head injury were measures of the severity of injury (length of coma, CT diagnosis. GCS on discharge). We conclude that: (a) moderate head injury, not described previously in the literature, results in mortality and substantial morbidity intermediate between those of severe and minor head injury; (b) unlike minor head injury, the principal predictors of outcome after moderate head injury are measures of the severity of injury; and (c) more attention should be directed to patients with moderate head injury than to those with the most severe injuries, in whom brain damage is probably irreversible and all forms of management have demonstrated little success.


The Lancet ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 337 (8744) ◽  
pp. 788-789 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franco Servadei

2012 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 209-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Drissa Zongo ◽  
Régis Ribéreau-Gayon ◽  
Françoise Masson ◽  
Magali Laborey ◽  
Benjamin Contrand ◽  
...  

1988 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. 185-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.T. Tebano ◽  
M. Cameroni ◽  
G. Gallozzi ◽  
A. Loizzo ◽  
G. Palazzino ◽  
...  

Heart ◽  
1976 ◽  
Vol 38 (9) ◽  
pp. 984-985 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marshall

Neurosurgery ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 532-534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rudolf Schoenhuber ◽  
Massimo Gentilini

Abstract Thirty patients suffering from minor head injury were examined with auditory brain stem responses (ABR), neuropsy-chological tests for assessment of higher nervous functions, and a questionnaire on postconcussional symptoms. Comparison of the 6 patients with altered ABR with the other 24 showed no statistical difference in either the number of long-lasting postconcussional symptoms or the scores on neuropsychological tests. Subclinical brain stem involvement as shown by ABR does not seem to correlate with impaired mental function or symptoms of the postconcussion syndrome. This greatly limits the use of ABR in forensic medicine.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document