Is the diagnostic yield of upper GI endoscopy improved by the use of explicit panel-based appropriateness criteria?

2000 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 333-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florian Froehlich ◽  
Claude Repond ◽  
Beat Müllhaupt ◽  
John-Paul Vader ◽  
Bernard Burnand ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Yield ◽  
Appropriateness Criteria ◽  
Gi Endoscopy ◽  
Upper Gi ◽  
Upper Gi Endoscopy

Diagnostic Yield of ASGE Appropriateness Criteria of Upper GI Endoscopy. An Italian Multicenter Study at 44 Open-Access Digestive Endoscopy Services

2005 ◽  
Vol 100 ◽  
pp. S275-S276
Author(s):  
Gianluca Bersani ◽  
Marcello Anti ◽  
Maria Antonietta Bianco ◽  
Luigi Buri ◽  
Emilio Di Giulio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Multicenter Study ◽  
Diagnostic Yield ◽  
Digestive Endoscopy ◽  
Appropriateness Criteria ◽  
Gi Endoscopy ◽  
Upper Gi ◽  
Upper Gi Endoscopy

Su1197 The Diagnostic Yield of Pre-Operative Upper Gi Endoscopy in Patients With Radiologically Confirmed Gastric Volvulus

2017 ◽  
Vol 85 (5) ◽  
pp. AB310
Author(s):  
Guilherme Piovezani Ramos ◽  
Shounak Majumder ◽  
Seth Sweetser
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Yield ◽  
Gastric Volvulus ◽  
Gi Endoscopy ◽  
Upper Gi ◽  
Upper Gi Endoscopy

scholarly journals PTH-182 What is the Diagnostic Yield of Duodenal Biopsy at upper GI Endoscopy?

Gut ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 62 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A285.2-A285
Author(s):  
F Debonera ◽  
P Nair ◽  
M Thoufeeq
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Yield ◽  
Duodenal Biopsy ◽  
Gi Endoscopy ◽  
Upper Gi ◽  
Upper Gi Endoscopy

USE OF ROADMAP FLUOROSCOPY IN UPPER GI ENDOSCOPY

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Weigt ◽  
W Elhossary ◽  
W Obst ◽  
P Maciej
Keyword(s):  
Gi Endoscopy ◽  
Upper Gi ◽  
Upper Gi Endoscopy

scholarly journals A comparative study of multi-detector CT portography versus endoscopy in evaluation of gastro-esophageal varices in portal hypertension patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hany El-Assaly ◽  
Lamiaa I. A. Metwally ◽  
Heba Azzam ◽  
Mohamed Ibrahim Seif-Elnasr
Keyword(s):  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Portal Vein ◽  
Esophageal Varices ◽  
Imaging Modality ◽  
Splenic Vein ◽  
Gastric Varices ◽  
Gi Endoscopy ◽  
Upper Gi ◽  
Upper Gi Endoscopy ◽  
Vein Diameter

Abstract Background Portal hypertension is a major complication resulting from obstruction of portal blood flow, like cirrhosis or portal vein thrombosis, that leads to portal hypertension. MDCT angiography has become an important tool for investigation of the liver as well as potentially challenging varices by detailing the course of these tortuous vessels. This information is decisive for liver transplantation as well as for common procedures in which an unexpected varix can cause significant bleeding. Results This study included an assessment of 60 cases of portal hypertension (28 males and 32 females), their age ranged from 42 to 69 years (mean age = 57.2 ± 6.63). All patients were diagnosed with portal hypertension, underwent upper GI endoscopy followed by a triphasic CT scan with CT angiographic assessment for the screening of gastro-esophageal varices. CT is highly sensitive as compared to upper GI endoscopy (sensitivity 93%) in detecting esophageal varices. Gastric varices detected by CT in 22 patients (37%) compared to 14 patients (23%) detected by endoscopy. While paraesophageal varices were detected in 63% of patients and retro-gastric varices in 80% of patients that were not visualized by endoscopy. Our study reported that the commonest type of collaterals were the splenic collaterals, and we also found there is a significant correlation between the portal vein diameter and the number of collaterals as well as between the portal vein diameter and splenic vein diameter. Conclusions Multi-slice CT serves as an important non-invasive imaging modality in the diagnosis of collaterals in cases of portal hypertension. CT portography can replace endoscopy in the detection of high-risk varices. It also proved that there is a correlation between portal vein diameter, splenic vein diameter, and number of collaterals.

scholarly journals LMA® Gastro™: A paediatric experience

2021 ◽  
pp. 0310057X2098159
Author(s):  
Charlotte L Taylor ◽  
Steven R Wilson ◽  
Laura L Burgoyne ◽  
Yasmin Endlich
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Education Programme ◽  
Paediatric Population ◽  
Airway Device ◽  
Older Children ◽  
Gi Endoscopy ◽  
Upper Gi ◽  
Upper Gi Endoscopy ◽  
Trial Basis ◽  
Endoscopy Outcomes

The laryngeal mask airway, the LMA® Gastro™ (Teleflex Medical, Athlone, Ireland), is a novel airway device which permits upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy to be performed via a dedicated large calibre oesophageal lumen. It has been validated in adult studies, but to our knowledge, there have been no data published regarding its use in a paediatric population. Following a brief education programme, the LMA Gastro was introduced on a trial basis at our institution and made freely available. Over a four-month period, our pre-existing endoscopy audit framework captured data on a total of 55 patients who had the LMA Gastro device chosen as the primary airway for elective upper GI endoscopy. These data were collected prospectively by the treating anaesthetist and included a range of airway and endoscopy outcomes. Of the 55 patients, the LMA Gastro provided an adequate airway in 52 (94.5%). Forty-six (88.5%) were sited on first attempt, and 50 (96.2%) insertions were rated ‘easy’ by the anaesthetist. Aside from three insertion failures, there were no airway events. The endoscopy success rate was 100% in the 52 patients who had an LMA Gastro airway successfully inserted. First-pass oesophageal access was achieved in 51 (98%) cases, and 100% of insertions were rated ‘easy’ by the gastroenterologist. Despite our relative inexperience with it, the device had a high success rate for airway maintenance and oesophageal access in our paediatric patient population. In our institution, the LMA Gastro provided a useful airway option in older children undergoing elective upper GI endoscopy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document