Teaching radiology in Egyptian medical schools: Where do we stand and how can we start?

Background Radiology serves in the diagnosis and management of many diseases. Despite its rising importance and use, radiology is not a core component of a lot of medical school curricula. This survey aims to clarify current gaps in the radiological education in Egyptian medical schools. In February–May 2021, 5318 students enrolled in Egyptian medical schools were recruited and given a 20-multiple-choice-question survey assessing their radiology knowledge, radiograph interpretation, and encountered imaging experiences. We measured the objective parameters as a percentage. We conducted descriptive analysis and used Likert scales where values were represented as numerical values. Percentages were graphed afterwards. Results A total of 5318 medical students in Egypt answered our survey. Gender distribution was 45% males and 54% females. The results represented all 7 class years of medical school (six academic years and a final training year). In assessing students’ knowledge of radiology, most students (75%) reported that they received ‘too little’ education, while 20% stated the amount was ‘just right’ and only 4% reported it was ‘too much.’ Sixty-two percent of students stated they were taught radiology through medical imaging lectures. Participants’ future career plans were almost equally distributed. Near half of participants (43%) have not heard about the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria (ACR-AR), while 39% have heard about it but are not familiar with. Conclusions Radiology is a novel underestimated field. Therefore, medical students need more imaging exposure. To accomplish this, attention and efforts should be directed toward undergraduate radiology education to dissolve the gap between radiology and other specialties during clinical practice. A survey answered by medical students can bridge between presence of any current defect in undergraduate radiology teaching and future solutions for this topic.

The Appropriateness Criteria of Abdominal Fat Measurement at the Level of the L1-L2 Intervertebral Disc in Patients With Obesity

BackgroundIn this study, we proposed to use MR images at L1-L2 (lumbar) intervertebral disc level to measure abdominal fat area in patients with obesity. The quantitative results would provide evidence for the individualized assessment of the severity of obesity.MethodsAll patients in the IRB-approved database of Beijing Friendship Hospital who underwent bariatric surgery between November 2017 and November 2019 were recruited. We retrospectively reviewed upper abdominal magnetic resonance (MR) data before surgery. We analyzed the correlation and consistency of the area of abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue (ASAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) measured at the L1-L2 and L2-L3 levels on MR images. We randomly distributed the cases into prediction model training data and testing data at a ratio of 7:3.ResultsTwo hundred and forty-five subjects were included. The ASAT and VAT results within the L1-L2 and L2-L3 levels were very similar and highly correlated (maleASAT: r=0.98, femaleASAT: r=0.93; maleVAT: r=0.91, femaleVAT: r=0.88). There was no substantial systematic deviation among the results at the two levels, except for the ASAT results in males. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were 0.91 and 0.93 for maleASAT and femaleASAT, and 0.88 and 0.87 for maleVAT and femaleVAT, respectively. The ASAT/VAT area at the L2-L3 level was well predicted. The coefficient β of linear regression that predicted L2-L3 ASAT from L1-L2 ASAT was 1.11 for males and 0.99 for females. The R-squares were 0.97 and 0.91, respectively. For VAT prediction, the coefficient β was 1.02 for males and 0.96 for females. The R-squares were 0.82 and 0.77, respectively.ConclusionFor patients with obesity, the L1-L2 intervertebral disc level can be used as the substitution of L2-L3 level in abdominal fat measurement.

Implementing Multi-Criteria Analysis in the Selection of AUCHS for the Integration of Digital Technologies into the Tourism Offering: The Case of MeDryDive

Focusing on both physical and virtual accessibility, this paper presents the methodology developed by MeDryDive for the selection of AUCHS (Accessible Underwater Cultural Heritage Sites) in Greece, Italy, Croatia, and Montenegro. MeDryDive is a project that aims at the promotion of AUCHS in the Mediterranean as distinctive tourism destinations through personalized dry dive experiences. The candidate sites are assessed in order to be included in the transnational thematic tourism product “Dive in the Past” and promoted through Creative and Cultural Industry (CCI) applications, including a Serious Game, Augmented and Virtual Reality applications, and promotional videos, all developed in the context of the project. The main goal of the methodology is to meet the requirements for both the sustainability of the thematic tourism product and the digital applications’ development. The assessment of AUCHS is based on specific criteria that result from setting weighing factors and classifying indicators as either critical or non-critical. The criteria are categorized into core (feasibility) criteria and complementary (appropriateness) criteria for determining the total level of readiness. This set of criteria enables site selection through an elimination method, identifying the suitable pilot and follow-on sites for the integration of digital technologies into the tourism offering.