Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type III) with aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with stage I cervical cancer: Surgical morbidity and intermediate follow-up

2002 ◽  
Vol 187 (2) ◽  
pp. 340-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nick M. Spirtos ◽  
Scott M. Eisenkop ◽  
John B. Schlaerth ◽  
Samuel C. Ballon
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Pelvic Lymphadenectomy ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Surgical Morbidity ◽  
Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Type Iii

scholarly journals Robotic-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy Results in Better Surgical Outcomes Compared With the Traditional Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Cervical Cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. 1990-1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji-Chan Nie ◽  
An-Qi Yan ◽  
Xi-Shi Liu
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Surgical Outcomes ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Bowel Function ◽  
Lymph Node Yield ◽  
Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Function Recovery ◽  
Node Yield

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy (RRH) with traditional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (TLRH) for the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer in a large retrospective cohort of a total of 933 patients.MethodsWe have enrolled 100 patients into the RRH and 833 patients into the TLRH group. The surgical outcomes include operating time, blood loss, transfusion rate, pelvic lymph node yield, hospitalization days, duration of bowel function recovery, catheter removal before and after 3 weeks, conversion to laparotomy, and intraoperative and postoperative complications. Follow-up results were also analyzed for all patients.ResultsBoth groups have similar patient and tumor characteristics but patients with a larger lesion size were preferably enrolled in the TLRH treatment group. The treatment with RRH was generally superior to TLRH with respect to operating time, blood loss, length of hospitalization, duration of bowel function recovery, and postoperative complications. On follow-up of patients, there were no relapses reported in the RRH group compared with 4% of relapse cases and 2.9% of deaths because of metastasis in the TLRH group. No conversion of laparotomy occurred in the RRH group. No significant difference was found with respect to intraoperative complications and blood transfusion between both groups.ConclusionsThe results from this study suggest that RRH is superior to TLRH with regard to surgical outcome and may pose a safe and feasible alternative to TLRH. The operating time and lymph node yield is acceptable. Our study is one of the largest single-center studies of surgical outcomes comparing RRH with TLRH during cervical cancer treatment and will significantly contribute to the safety of alternative treatment options for patients. Furthermore, the difference detected between TLRH and RRH group is further strengthened by the great expertise of the surgeon performing laparoscopic surgeries.

Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy: an analysis of oncologic outcomes from Hospital Italiano (Argentina)

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 863-868 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego Odetto ◽  
Maria Celeste Puga ◽  
Jose Saadi ◽  
Florencia Noll ◽  
Myriam Perrotta
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Adenosquamous Carcinoma ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Disease Free

BackgroundThe Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) trial demonstrated a higher rate of disease recurrence and worse disease-free survival in patients who underwent minimally invasive radical hysterectomy.ObjectivesTo evaluate surgical and oncological outcome of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy performed at Hospital Italiano in Buenos Aires, Argentina.MethodsThis retrospective study included all patients with cervical cancer, 2009 FIGO stage IA1, with lymphovascular invasion to IB1 (<4 cm) who underwent a laparoscopic radical hysterectomy between June 2010 and June 2015. Patients were eligible if they had squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous carcinoma, and no lymph node involvement by imaging. Patients must have undergone a type C1 radical hysterectomy. Only patients who were treated by a laparoscopic approach were included. Patients were excluded if histopathology showed a component of neuroendocrine carcinoma before or after surgery; if they had synchronous primary tumors, history of abdominal or pelvic radiotherapy, or were operated on at an outside institution; and if they had only surgery and no follow-up in our institution. Relapse rate and disease-free survival were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method.ResultsA total of 108 patients were evaluated. The median age was 41 years (range 27–70). Distribution of histologic sub-types was squamous carcinoma in 77 patients (71%), adenocarcinoma in 27 patients (25%), and adenosquamous carcinoma in four patients (4%). Ninety-nine patients (92%) had stage IB1 tumors and 58 (54%) patients had tumors ≤2 cm. The median surgical time was 240 min (range 190–290), the median estimated blood loss was 140 mL (range 50–500) and the transfusion rate was 3.7%. The median length of hospital stay was 2 days (range 1–11). The median follow-up time was 39 months (range 11–83). The global recurrence rate after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy was 15% (16/108). According to tumor size, the recurrence rate was 12% in patients with tumors ≤2 cm (7/58) and 18% in patients with tumors >2 cm (9/50) (OR=0.76; 95% CI 0.26 to 2.22; p=0.62) The 3- and 5-year relapse rate was 17% (95% CI 11% to 27%). The 3- and 5-year disease-free survival was 81% (95% CI 71% to 88%) and 70% (95% CI 43% to 86%), respectively. Overall survival at 3 years was 87% (95% CI 76% to 93%).ConclusionThe recurrence rate after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy was 15%, and in tumors ≤2 cm it was 12%. The 3-year disease-free survival was 81%. Given these results our hospital has changed the approach to open radical hysterectomy.

Surgical and Pathological Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy With Pelvic Lymphadenectomy and/or Para-aortic Lymph Node Sampling for Bulky Early-Stage Cervical Cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 1222-1227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Zhu ◽  
Xi Chen ◽  
Jianqing Zhu ◽  
Yaqing Chen ◽  
Aijun Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Pelvic Lymphadenectomy ◽  
Tumor Diameter ◽  
Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Lymph Node Sampling ◽  
Aortic Lymph Node ◽  
Early Stage Cervical Cancer

Background and ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to compare the feasibility, morbidity, and recurrence rate of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) with those of abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) for bulky early-stage cervical cancer.MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study of 112 patients with stage IB1 or IIA2 cervical cancer in which the tumor diameter was 3 cm or greater. All patients underwent LRH (n = 30) or ARH (n = 82) with pelvic lymphadenectomy and/or para-aortic lymph node sampling between May 2011 and November 2014. Perioperative outcomes were compared between the 2 surgical groups.ResultsThe laparoscopic approach consisted of 4 trocar insertions. Age, tumor diameter, and pelvic lymph nodes significantly differed between the 2 cohorts. Body mass index, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage, histologic type and grade, deep stromal invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, positive margins, and adjuvant therapy were not significantly different between the 2 cohorts. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy exhibited favorable results compared with ARH in terms of operating time, blood loss, intestinal exhaust time, and length of hospital stay. In addition, recurrence was observed in 5 LRH patients (16.7%) and 9 ARH patients (11.7%).ConclusionsThe surgical outcomes of LRH with pelvic lymphadenectomy and/or para-aortic lymph node sampling exhibited a similar therapeutic efficacy to those of the ARH approach.

Effectiveness of modified complex decongestive physiotherapy for preventing lower extremity lymphedema after radical surgery for cervical cancer: a randomized controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 757-763 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xia Wang ◽  
Yan Ding ◽  
Hui-Yuan Cai ◽  
Jing You ◽  
Fang-Qin Fan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Health Education ◽  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Radical Surgery ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Pelvic Lymphadenectomy ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Complex Decongestive Physiotherapy

BackgroundThere is a lack of evidence in support of any prophylactic measure to prevent secondary lower extremity lymphedema after radical hysterectomy among patients with cervical cancer. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of modified complex decongestive physiotherapy in reducing the risk of secondary lower extremity lymphedema after radical surgery.MethodsA randomized single-blind clinical trial was conducted in 120 patients with cervical cancer who underwent laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy between January 2016 and April 2017 in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China. Participants were randomly assigned to a modified complex decongestive physiotherapy intervention group (n=60) or control group (n=60). The intervention group received a modified complex decongestive physiotherapy program, which included manual lymph drainage, compression hosiery, regular exercise, and health education. The control group only received a health education program. The main outcome was the incidence of secondary lower extremity lymphedema.ResultsA total of 117 patients with cervical cancer completed a 1-year follow-up. Twenty-eight (23.9%) patients developed secondary lower extremity lymphedema (20 (34.5%) patients in the control group and 8 (13.6%) in the intervention group). The incidence of secondary lower extremity lymphedema was significantly higher in the control group than in the intervention group (p=0.008; OR 0.30 (95% CI 0.12 to 0.75). The median percentage of excess volume was significantly less in the intervention group (2.1%, IQR 0.5–3.4%) than in the control group (2.96%, IQR 1.1–4.98%); (p=0.042). The mean (SD) onset time of lymphedema was 8 (2.00) months vs 4.6 (2.82) months in the intervention and control groups, respectively (p=0.004).ConclusionsThis randomized trial showed that modified complex decongestive physiotherapy is effective for preventing lower extremity lymphedema in patients with cervical cancer after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document