Perceptual Organization of Apparent Motion in the Ternus Display

Perception ◽  
10.1068/p2941 ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 28 (7) ◽  
pp. 877-892 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zijiang J He ◽  
Teng Leng Ooi

Perception ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vilayanur S Ramachandran ◽  
Stuart M Anstis

Is motion perception based on a local piecemeal analysis of the image or do ‘global’ effects also play an important role? Use was made of bistable apparent-motion displays in trying to answer this question. Two spots were flashed simultaneously on diagonally opposite corners of a 1 deg wide square and then switched off and replaced by two spots appearing on the other two corners. One can either see vertical or horizontal oscillation and the display is bistable just as a Necker cube is. If several such bistable figures are randomly scattered on the screen and presented simultaneously, then one usually sees the same motion axis in all of them, suggesting the presence of field-like effects for resolving ambiguity in apparent motion. While viewing a single figure observers experience hysteresis: they tend to adhere to one motion axis or the other and can switch the axis only by looking away and looking back after 10–30 s have elapsed. The figure can be switched off and made to reappear at some other random location on the screen and it is then always found to retain its motion axis. Several such demonstrations are presented to show that spatial induction effects in metastable motion displays may provide a particularly valuable probe for studying ‘laws’ of perceptual organization.



2002 ◽  
Vol 42 (8) ◽  
pp. 1005-1016 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Alais ◽  
Jean Lorenceau


Perception ◽  
10.1068/p3444 ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 669-685 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Ma-Wyatt ◽  
Colin W G Clifford ◽  
Peter Wenderoth

We investigated whether the same principles that influence grouping in static displays also influence grouping in apparent motion. Using the Ternus display, we found that the proportion of group motion reports was influenced by changes in contrast configuration. Subjects made judgments of completion of these same configurations in a static display. Generally, contrast configurations that induced a high proportion of group motion responses were judged as more ‘complete’ in static displays. Using a stereo display, we then tested whether stereo information and T-junction information were critical for this increase in group motion. Perceived grouping was consistently higher for same contrast polarity configurations than for opposite contrast polarity configurations, regardless of the presence of stereo information or explicit T-junctions. Thus, while grouping in static and moving displays showed a similar dependence on contrast configuration, motion grouping showed little dependence on stereo or T-junction information.









2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Roseboom ◽  
T. Kawabe ◽  
S. Nishida


2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Z. Strybel ◽  
Andrea S. Rottermann
Keyword(s):  


2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph S. Lappin ◽  
Duje Tadin ◽  
Emily Grossman


1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Wohlschlager


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document