scholarly journals Neural networks as a tool for utilizing laboratory information: comparison with linear discriminant analysis and with classification and regression trees.

1991 ◽  
Vol 88 (24) ◽  
pp. 11426-11430 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Reibnegger ◽  
G. Weiss ◽  
G. Werner-Felmayer ◽  
G. Judmaier ◽  
H. Wachter
Methodology ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 47-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Holmes Finch ◽  
Mercedes K. Schneider

Abstract. This paper compares the predictive accuracy of three commonly used parametric methods for group classification, linear discriminant analysis, quadratic discriminant analysis, and logistic regression, with two less common approaches, neural networks and classification and regression trees. The simulation study examined the impact of such factors as inequality of covariance matrices, distribution of predictors, and group size ratio (among others) on the performance of each method. Results indicate that quadratic discriminant analysis always performs as well as the other methods while neural networks behave very similarly to linear discriminant analysis and logistic regression.


Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (23) ◽  
pp. 6763
Author(s):  
Mads Jochumsen ◽  
Imran Khan Niazi ◽  
Muhammad Zia ur Rehman ◽  
Imran Amjad ◽  
Muhammad Shafique ◽  
...  

Brain- and muscle-triggered exoskeletons have been proposed as a means for motor training after a stroke. With the possibility of performing different movement types with an exoskeleton, it is possible to introduce task variability in training. It is difficult to decode different movement types simultaneously from brain activity, but it may be possible from residual muscle activity that many patients have or quickly regain. This study investigates whether nine different motion classes of the hand and forearm could be decoded from forearm EMG in 15 stroke patients. This study also evaluates the test-retest reliability of a classical, but simple, classifier (linear discriminant analysis) and advanced, but more computationally intensive, classifiers (autoencoders and convolutional neural networks). Moreover, the association between the level of motor impairment and classification accuracy was tested. Three channels of surface EMG were recorded during the following motion classes: Hand Close, Hand Open, Wrist Extension, Wrist Flexion, Supination, Pronation, Lateral Grasp, Pinch Grasp, and Rest. Six repetitions of each motion class were performed on two different days. Hudgins time-domain features were extracted and classified using linear discriminant analysis and autoencoders, and raw EMG was classified with convolutional neural networks. On average, 79 ± 12% and 80 ± 12% (autoencoders) of the movements were correctly classified for days 1 and 2, respectively, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.88. No association was found between the level of motor impairment and classification accuracy (Spearman correlation: 0.24). It was shown that nine motion classes could be decoded from residual EMG, with autoencoders being the best classification approach, and that the results were reliable across days; this may have implications for the development of EMG-controlled exoskeletons for training in the patient’s home.


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 57-60
Author(s):  
Денис Кривогуз ◽  
Denis Krivoguz

Modern approaches to the region’s landslide susceptibility assessment are considered in this paper. Have been presented descriptions of the most used techniques for landslide susceptibility assessment: logistic regression, indicator validity, linear discriminant analysis and application of artificial neural networks. These techniques’ advantages and disadvantages are discussed in the paper. The most suitable techniques for various conditions of analysis have been marked. It has been concluded that the most acceptable techniques of analysis for a large number of input data related to the studied region are the method of logistic regression and indicator validity method. With these methods the most accurate results are achieved. When there is a lack of information, it is more expedient to use linear discriminant analysis and artificial neural networks that will minimize potential analysis inaccuracies.


2009 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 233-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huseyin Ince ◽  
Bora Aktan

Credit scoring is a very important task for lenders to evaluate the loan applications they receive from consumers as well as for insurance companies, which use scoring systems today to evaluate new policyholders and the risks these prospective customers might present to the insurer. Credit scoring systems are used to model the potential risk of loan applications, which have the advantage of being able to handle a large volume of credit applications quickly with minimal labour, thus reducing operating costs, and they may be an effective substitute for the use of judgment among inexperienced loan officers, thus helping to control bad debt losses. This study explores the performance of credit scoring models using traditional and artificial intelligence approaches: discriminant analysis, logistic regression, neural networks and classification and regression trees. Experimental studies using real world data sets have demonstrated that the classification and regression trees and neural networks outperform the traditional credit scoring models in terms of predictive accuracy and type II errors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document