scholarly journals CH···O Hydrogen Bonds at Protein-Protein Interfaces

2002 ◽  
Vol 277 (40) ◽  
pp. 37732-37740 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin Jiang ◽  
Luhua Lai
1997 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 999-1012 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Xu ◽  
C. J. Tsai ◽  
R. Nussinov

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 513-522
Author(s):  
Christina Nilofer ◽  
Arumugam Mohanapriya

The Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV-1) type 1 viral protein is a life threatening virus causing HIV/AIDS in infected humans. The HIV-1 envelope (ENV) trimer glycoprotein GP160 (GP120-GP41) is gaining attention in recent years as a potential vaccine candidate for HIV-1/AIDS. However, the sequence variation and charge polarity at the interacting sites across clades is a shortcoming faced in the development of an effective HIV-1 vaccine. We analyzed the interfaces in terms of its interface area, interface size, and interface energies (van der Waals, hydrogen bonds, and electrostatics). The interfaces were divided as dominant (≥60%) and subdominant (<60%) based on van der Waals contribution to total energies. 88% of GP120 and 74% of GP41 interfaces are highly pronounced with van der Waals energy having large interfaces with interface size (98±65 (GP120) and 73±65 (GP41)) and interface area (882±1166Å2 (GP120) and 921±1288Å2 (GP41)). Nevertheless, 12% of GP120 and 26% of GP41 interfaces have subdominant van der Waals energies having small interfaces with interface size (58±20 (GP120) and 27±9 (GP41)) and interface area (581±1605Å2 (GP120) and 483±896Å2 (GP41)). It was interesting to observe GP41 small interfaces with subdominant van der Waals are stabilized by electrostatics (r2=0.63) without hydrogen bonds (r2=0). However, GP120 small interfaces were found to have two fold more hydrogen bonds (r2=0.59) than electrostatics (r2=0.20). Therefore, our previous finding stating that small protein-protein interfaces rich in electrostatics holds true in case of GP41 whereas not with GP120 protein interfaces.


2005 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 893-904 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin Jiang ◽  
Brian Kuhlman ◽  
Tanja Kortemme ◽  
David Baker

2020 ◽  
Vol 80 (5) ◽  
pp. 903-914.e8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meredith Corley ◽  
Ryan A. Flynn ◽  
Byron Lee ◽  
Steven M. Blue ◽  
Howard Y. Chang ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 95 (3) ◽  
pp. 525-537 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. NOBELI S. L. PRICE R. J. WHEATLEY
Keyword(s):  

1964 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 487-492 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.E. Rundle
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 87
Author(s):  
Mohd Abdul Fatah Abdul Manan ◽  
M. Ibrahim M. Tahir ◽  
Karen A. Crouse ◽  
Fiona N.-F. How ◽  
David J. Watkin

The crystal structure of the title compound has been determined. The compound crystallized in the triclinic space group P -1, Z = 2, V = 1839 .42( 18) A3 and unit cell parameters a= 11. 0460( 6) A, b = 13 .3180(7) A, c=13. 7321 (8) A, a = 80.659(3 )0, b = 69 .800(3 )0 and g = 77 .007 (2)0 with one disordered dimethylsulfoxide solvent molecule with the sulfur and oxygen atoms are distributed over two sites; S101/S102 [site occupancy factors: 0.6035/0.3965] and 0130/0131 [site occupancy factor 0.3965/0.6035]. The C22-S2 l and C 19-S20 bond distances of 1. 779(7) A and 1. 788(8) A indicate that both of the molecules are connected by the disulfide bond [S20-S21 2.055(2) A] in its thiol form. The crystal structure reveals that both of the 5-bromoisatin moieties are trans with respect to the [S21-S20 and CI 9-Nl 8] and [S20-S21 and C22-N23] bonds whereas the benzyl group from the dithiocarbazate are in the cis configuration with respect to [S21-S20 and C19-S44] and [S20-S21 and C22-S36] bonds. The crystal structure is further stabilized by intermolecular hydrogen bonds of N9-H35···O16 formed between the two molecules and N28-H281 ···O130, N28-H281 ···O131 and C4 l-H4 l l ···O 131 with the solvent molecule.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document