Firm size distributions in an industry with constrained resources

2008 ◽  
Vol 40 (12) ◽  
pp. 1595-1607 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony B. Lawrance ◽  
Robert E. Marks
Keyword(s):  
PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. e0183627 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandro Claudio Lera ◽  
Didier Sornette

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 423-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerrit de Wit
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang Sup Cho

Purpose This study aims to estimate the firm size distributions that belong to the service sector and manufacturing sector in Korea. Design/methodology/approach When estimating the firm size distribution, the author considers the following two major factors. First, the firm size distribution can have a gamma distribution rather than traditional accepted distributions such as Pareto distribution or log-normal distribution. In particular, industry-specific enterprises can have different size distributions of the type of gamma distribution. Second, the firm size distribution that is applied to this study’s data set should reflect a number of factors. For example, estimating mixture gamma distribution for firm size distribution should be required and compared, because the total amount of configuration data is composed of small businesses, medium-sized and large companies. Findings Using 8,230 number of firm data in 2013, the author estimates mixture gamma distribution for the firm size. Originality/value From the comparison, empirical results are found for the following characteristics of core firm size distribution: first, the firm size distribution of the manufacturing sector has a longer tail than firm size distribution of the service sector. Second, the manufacturing firm size distribution dominates the entire country firm size distribution. Third, one factor among the three factors that make up the mixed gamma firm size distribution is described for 99 per cent of the firm size distributions. From the estimated firm size distributions of the service sector and manufacturing sector in Korea, the author simply implies the strategy and policy implications for the start-up firm.


2019 ◽  
Vol 523 ◽  
pp. 858-875 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piero Montebruno ◽  
Robert J. Bennett ◽  
Carry van Lieshout ◽  
Harry Smith

1974 ◽  
Vol 82 (2, Part 1) ◽  
pp. 315-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuji Ijiri ◽  
Herbert A. Simon

2008 ◽  
Vol 98 (1) ◽  
pp. 426-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Angelini ◽  
Andrea Generale

We study the impact of financial constraints on firm size distribution (FSD). We find that financially constrained firms, identified using various proxies, are smaller than the others (their FSD is more skewed to the right). Among OECD countries, however, the FSD of nonconstrained firms virtually overlaps that of the entire sample, suggesting that the overall impact of financial constraints on the FSD is modest. The difference is more pronounced in our sample of firms from non-OECD countries. We conclude that financial constraints cannot be considered the main determinant of the FSD evolution in developed economies. (JEL L11, L25)


Author(s):  
Shouji Fujimoto ◽  
Atushi Ishikawa ◽  
Takayuki Mizuno ◽  
Tsutomu Watanabe

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document