A Group-Based Approach to Boosting Scholarly Productivity in Clinical Faculty

Author(s):  
E. Sherwood Brown ◽  
Reed J. Robinson
2004 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel B. Shabani ◽  
James E. Carr ◽  
Anna Ingeborg Petursdottir ◽  
Barbara E. Esch ◽  
Jill N. Gillett

1981 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-48
Author(s):  
Dick R. Gourley ◽  
David E. Kapel ◽  
John W. Hill

The locus of control dimensions among senior Pharm.D. students electing post-Pharm.D. residencies (N=15) are compared with first (N = 60) and second year (N = 55) Pharm.D. students, as well as with senior Pharm.D. students not electing residencies (N=14). Volunteer clinical faculty [hospital (N=27) and community (N = 23) pharmacy preceptors] and full-time clinical faculty (N = 22) are also compared. The Reid-Ware three-factor internal-external scale was completed by the study population. The dimensions measured were: self-control, social systems control, and fatalism. This study was undertaken to: 1. compare the locus of control dimensions among senior pharmacy students electing post-Pharm.D. residencies with senior pharmacy students not electing post-Pharm.D. residencies (and with other pharmacy students) and 2. compare the locus of control dimensions among senior pharmacy students electing and not electing post-Pharm. D. residencies (and with other pharmacy students) with their clinical, hospital, and community faculty to identify personality congruence (i.e., similarities, differences) which might facilitate the development of patient oriented-interactive behaviors necessary for clinical practice. Self-control (SC) was the major factor that generated the significant difference in the seven groups. The clinical (full-time) faculty group is significantly different from the student groups with the exception of the P-3, residency students. Over 50 percent of the P-3 residency group responded more like the faculty groups than like other students, with more P-3 residency students responding like clinical faculty than any other student or faculty group. The implication is that a similar personality profile exists in terms of internal/external control for the P-3 residency and full-time clinical faculty groups. Professors may have influenced, stimulated, or motivated those students most like themselves to enter a residency program. Based on the data, it would appear desirable to profile pharmacy students and give those who have a strong internal self-control factor encouragement to pursue post-graduate academic or residency programs and to retain as many of those individuals as possible in the areas of pharmacy that directly influence patient care and the pharmacist's role on the health care team.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 237802312110069
Author(s):  
Molly M. King ◽  
Megan E. Frederickson

Academia serves as a valuable case for studying the effects of social forces on workplace productivity, using a concrete measure of output: scholarly papers. Many academics, especially women, have experienced unprecedented challenges to scholarly productivity during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The authors analyze the gender composition of more than 450,000 authorships in the arXiv and bioRxiv scholarly preprint repositories from before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. This analysis reveals that the underrepresentation of women scientists in the last authorship position necessary for retention and promotion in the sciences is growing more inequitable. The authors find differences between the arXiv and bioRxiv repositories in how gender affects first, middle, and sole authorship submission rates before and during the pandemic. A review of existing research and theory outlines potential mechanisms underlying this widening gender gap in productivity during COVID-19. The authors aggregate recommendations for institutional change that could ameliorate challenges to women’s productivity during the pandemic and beyond.


2021 ◽  
Vol 257 ◽  
pp. 128-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Riccardi ◽  
Nicole I. Farber ◽  
Vanessa Ho ◽  
Stephanie L. Bonne

2016 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 670-681 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elza Mylona ◽  
Linda Brubaker ◽  
Valerie N Williams ◽  
Karen D Novielli ◽  
Jeffrey M Lyness ◽  
...  

EXPLORE ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 249-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachelle L. McCarty ◽  
Robin Fenn ◽  
Barak Gaster ◽  
Wendy Weber ◽  
Jane Guiltinan

1991 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 253-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
John J. Horan ◽  
Chris D. Erickson

Graduates and employees of four institutions-the MOMM Cartel-dominate every science and practice organ of Division 17's governing body. Counseling psychologists from the other 60 academic programs (the OUTSIDERs) face numerous barriers to professional ascendancy. Six of 13 fellow nominees during the 1988-1989 year were MOMM members; none were rejected. Three OUTSIDERs were elected; four were rejected. Mean scholarly productivity for each group was 13, 21.3, and 19.7 Psyc LIT citations, respectively. The accepted OUTSIDERs were significantly more productive than the MOMMs; two of the four rejected OUTSIDERs ranked numbers one and two in scholarly productivity among all nominees. No relationship appeared between scholarship and fellow decisions; MOMM membership strongly predicted election to fellow status. Personal familiarity with the evaluators, rather than professional service, apparently accounts for these filings -a variant of the "Matthew Effect" discussed in the sociology-of-science literature Recommendations for reform are offered


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document