Structure-preserving techniques in accelerator physics

Author(s):  
Dan T. Abell ◽  
Alex J. Dragt
Author(s):  
Sandip Tiwari

This chapter explores electromagnetic-matter interactions from photon to extinction length scales, i.e., nanometer of X-ray and above. Starting with Casimir-Polder effect to understand interactions of metals and dielectrics at near-atomic distance scale, it stretches to larger wavelengths to explore optomechanics and its ability for energy exchange and signal transduction between PHz and GHz. This range is explored with near-quantum sensitivity limits. The chapter also develops the understanding phononic bandgaps, and for photons, it explores the use of energetic coupling for useful devices such as optical tweezers, confocal microscopes and atomic clocks. It also explores miniature accelerators as a frontier area in accelerator physics. Plasmonics—the electromagnetic interaction with electron charge cloud—is explored for propagating and confined conditions together with the approaches’ possible uses. Optoelectronic energy conversion is analyzed in organic and inorganic systems, with their underlying interaction physics through solar cells and its thermodynamic limit, and quantum cascade lasers.


Author(s):  
M. P. Pavan Kumar ◽  
B. Poornima ◽  
H. S. Nagendraswamy ◽  
C. Manjunath

2019 ◽  
Vol 177 ◽  
pp. 106002
Author(s):  
Johnny Leung ◽  
Michel Kinnaert ◽  
Jean-Claude Maun ◽  
Fortunato Villella

Author(s):  
Jinjie Lin ◽  
Daniel Cohen-Or ◽  
Hao Zhang ◽  
Cheng Liang ◽  
Andrei Sharf ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 690-716
Author(s):  
Valérie Guérin

Reflexes of the Proto-Oceanic common noun marker *na are found throughout the Oceanic language family. In Mavea, there is a morpheme na but it no longer partakes in the determiner system and is best analyzed synchronically as a preposition. This paper argues that today’s preposition is a reflex of the Proto-Oceanic common noun marker *na. Locative constructions are shown to provide a critical context conducive to the reanalysis of *na. Reanalysis has long been established as a mechanism of syntactic change, yet the factors motivating it remain a matter for debate. The dominant view is that reanalysis is driven by pragmatic factors. A rarely voiced view is that it is driven by structural requirements. The data adduced in this paper lend support to a model of syntactic change which can be structure-preserving in nature.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document