Qualitative participatory evaluation of a psychosocial rehabilitation program for individuals with severe mental illness

2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Rouse ◽  
Christina Mutschler ◽  
Kelly McShane ◽  
Criss Habal-Brosek
Arts & Health ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 172-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert A. Ketch ◽  
Robert T. Rubin ◽  
Matthew R. Baker ◽  
Alexander C. Sones ◽  
Donna Ames

Author(s):  
Mariam Ujeyl ◽  
Wulf Rössler

Psychosocial rehabilitation (synonymously referred to as psychiatric rehabilitation) is a field and service within mental health systems that shifted the treatment focus from symptom control to social inclusion by functional recovery. It aims to help individuals with severe mental illness live in the community as independently as possible. Psychosocial rehabilitation (PR) developed in the 1970s, when psychiatric reform, including the process of deinstitutionalization, had already paved the way to more responsive and balanced provision of mental health care. This chapter outlines major developments in and obstacles to the reform in European and other high-income countries. It introduces the evolving principles of PR and presents evidence on important models of care, such as assertive community treatment (ACT) and individual placement and support (IPS), that share the objectives of PR to improve integration of people with severe mental illness into the labour market and society in general.


2021 ◽  
pp. 030802262098068
Author(s):  
Muhammad Zairul Rezal Zainol Abidin ◽  
Farahiyah Wan Yunus ◽  
Hanif Farhan Mohd Rasdi ◽  
Masne Kadar

Introduction Employment programmes for people with mental illness vary widely in range, but nonetheless all share the same objectives of restoring or initiating vocational roles to promote recovery in psychosocial rehabilitation. The current interventions available usually focus on the specific vocational outcomes of the intervention rather than focusing holistically on the client’s needs. Method This review aimed to examine the effectiveness of intervention programmes and determine the best intervention for schizophrenia and other severe mental illness, considering both vocational and non-vocational outcomes. Searching five databases – CINAHL, Medline via Ovid, Scopus, OT Seeker and Web of Science – a total of 3108 studies was identified; 24 met the selection criteria and were reviewed. Interventions were categorised into five major programmes of supported employment, integrated supported employment, vocational rehabilitation, cognitive intervention and virtual reality-based vocational training. Results Integrated supported employment was found to be the most effective approach for a vocational outcome. However, evidence concerning non-vocational outcomes of employment programmes and the use of cognitive training remains unclear. Conclusion Clinicians are advised to consider the needs and preferences of the client before selecting the best intervention programme. More research is needed to determine the applicability and the efficacy of intervention programmes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document