scholarly journals Development of local-scale high-resolution atmospheric dispersion model using large-eddy simulationpart 6: introduction of detailed dose calculation method

Author(s):  
Hiromasa Nakayama ◽  
Daiki Satoh ◽  
Haruyasu Nagai ◽  
Hiroaki Terada
PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. e0245932
Author(s):  
Daiki Satoh ◽  
Hiromasa Nakayama ◽  
Takuya Furuta ◽  
Tamotsu Yoshihiro ◽  
Kensaku Sakamoto

In this study, we developed a simulation code powered by lattice dose-response functions (hereinafter SIBYL), which helps in the quick and accurate estimation of external gamma-ray doses emitted from a radioactive plume and contaminated ground. SIBYL couples with atmospheric dispersion models and calculates gamma-ray dose distributions inside a target area based on a map of activity concentrations using pre-evaluated dose-response functions. Moreover, SIBYL considers radiation shielding due to obstructions such as buildings. To examine the reliability of SIBYL, we investigated five typical cases for steady-state and unsteady-state plume dispersions by coupling the Gaussian plume model and the local-scale high-resolution atmospheric dispersion model using large eddy simulation. The results of this coupled model were compared with those of full Monte Carlo simulations using the particle and heavy-ion transport code system (PHITS). The dose-distribution maps calculated using SIBYL differed by up to 10% from those calculated using PHITS in most target locations. The exceptions were locations far from the radioactive contamination and those behind the intricate structures of building arrays. In addition, SIBYL’s computation time using 96 parallel processing elements was several tens of minutes even for the most computationally expensive tasks of this study. The computation using SIBYL was approximately 100 times faster than the same calculation using PHITS under the same computation conditions. From the results of the case studies, we concluded that SIBYL can estimate a ground-level dose-distribution map within one hour with accuracy that is comparable to that of the full Monte Carlo simulation.


2005 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. S371-S377 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Rennesson ◽  
D. Maro ◽  
M. L. Fitamant ◽  
E. Prian

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document