Forensic Patients and the Mental Health Review Tribunal

1994 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-37
Author(s):  
Robert Hayes ◽  
Alan Langley ◽  
William Greer
2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 135-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lillian Ng ◽  
Susan Hatters Friedman ◽  
Kate Diesfeld

1970 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 86-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. C. Wood
Keyword(s):  

1998 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 197-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sir John Wood

The proceedings of a mental health review tribunal involve two psychiatrists – one to be found among its members and the other (having care of the patient) who appears before the tribunal as the responsible medical officer (RMO). Both have a very important role to play and the juxtaposition of two psychiatrists guarantees a lively debate at many tribunal hearings.


2003 ◽  
Vol 27 (02) ◽  
pp. 54-57
Author(s):  
Sean Whyte ◽  
Clive Meux

Aims and Method To estimate specific time and resource implications for professionals, if proposed changes to the Mental Health Act 1983 (England & Wales) in the Government's white paper were to be implemented unchanged. An audit of time spent on current procedures was extrapolated. Results The amount of time required to comply with the Act will rise substantially (by 27% overall). Social workers and independent doctors will spend 30% and 207% more time respectively, complying with the Act, but psychiatrists providing clinical care to forensic patients should be largely unaffected. Clinical Implications If the Government presses ahead with its plans for mental health law reform as currently proposed, extra resources will be required to provide additional social work and independent medical time – or other services for patients will suffer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document