The small group in problem-based learning: more than a cognitive ‘learning’ experience for first-year medical students in a diverse population

2006 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. e94-e103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle McLean ◽  
Jacqueline M. Van wyk ◽  
Edith M. Peters-Futre ◽  
Susan B. Higgins-Opitz
1983 ◽  
Vol 58 (10) ◽  
pp. 817-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
F L Ficklin ◽  
J D Hazelwood ◽  
J E Carter ◽  
R H Shellhamer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olukayode Matthew Tokode ◽  
Reg Dennick

Abstract Background Shared understanding is essential to effective collaborative learning. Interactive processes occurring in problem-based learning (PBL) tutorials have been explored to determine their cognitive and social advantages, but shared understanding is a relatively under-researched social process of PBL. The objective of this study is to describe how medical students share understanding in medical problem-based learning tutorials. MethodsWe recruited participants from first-year medical students in a single institution’s problem-based learning graduate entry curriculum. Transcripts from full cycles of eight tutorial groups were compiled to form the study corpus. Small interactional response words as indicators of shared understanding were measured using the Wmatrix 3 programme, and concordance lineswere analysed manually to determine word functions. ResultsInteractional response words were most prevalent in session 1 and least prevalent in session 2 of the PBL cycle. Interactional response words were used to mark unexpanded and simple and complex content expansion functions. While affirmation content expansion functions and reactive content expansion functions were more prevalent in sessions 1 and 3, negation content expansion functions were more frequent in session2. The frequency of interactional response words and their functions seem to align with the focus of each PBL tutorial session. ConclusionsDemonstrating the feasibility of corpus linguistics methodology for PBL concept analysis, this study showed that students in PBL tutorials attained sophisticated levels of shared understanding. We discussed the implication of the results for interprofessional teamworking and patient-doctor communication.


2010 ◽  
Vol 85 (8) ◽  
pp. 1276-1281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy L. Wayne ◽  
Michelle Vermillion ◽  
Sebastian Uijtdehaage

1997 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 146-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles L. Harris ◽  
Gül Güner ◽  
James Arbogast ◽  
Lisa Salati ◽  
James M. Shumway ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristina Kaljo

Introduction:  To address the country’s shortage of primary care physicians and increasing medical student debt, the Medical College of Wisconsin matriculated students into accelerated 3-year campuses in Central City and Packer City, while maintaining its traditional 4-year campus in Brew City, Wisconsin.  To ensure consistent content delivery within the basic science curriculum, students at all three campuses simultaneously participate in daily learning activities, utilizing distributed learning through a multidirectional digital classroom incorporating video-conferencing and audience response systems.     Methods:  To best uncover and understand the perspectives and attitudes of faculty and medical students, qualitative and quantitative research methods were employed framed within constructivist grounded theory.  This framework is rooted in social processes of the participants lived experiences and views these experiences as paramount to the analysis and presentation.  Prospectively, data was acquired regarding individual experiences from first-year medical students and medical school teaching faculty across the three campuses.  Beginning in the 2015–2016 academic year, nine semi-structured focus groups were conducted with concluding surveys.  These focus groups were separated by campus location: medical students at Brew City, medical students at Packer City, and faculty who taught at either the three-year regional campus or four-year campus.  In winter 2017, the study expanded including one additional student-centered focus group in Central City.  Each focus group was recorded using a hand-held device, transcribed, and analyzed using the constant comparative method.  This inductive approach required close examination of the transcriptions and line-by-line analysis to assign codes that captured the emerging themes.  To triangulate the data and further understand the medical student and faculty lived experiences, a concluding survey was distributed to participants.  This survey included eight, seven-point Likert-scale questions to further ascertain experience and overall satisfaction with the new learning environment.  Numerical data was analyzed with IBM® SPSS® 24.  This study was approved by the institutions review board. Results: In 2015–16, Packer City students rated their overall learning experience significantly (d=0.74, p<.050) higher (mean (sd)=7.6 (0.6)) than students in Brew City (6.7; 1.6) and significantly higher (d=1.21, p<.034) than the faculty (6.0 (1.0)). During 2016–17, overall learning experience scores did not differ from those of the previous years for Packer City (D=0.0) or Brew City students (D=0.0). A comparison of scores across all three campuses in 2016–17 yielded a significant change (d=1.28, p<.037) between the Central City campus (mean (sd)=7.8 (1.1)) and the Brew City campus (6.7 (0.5). No significant changes were reported between Packer City and the other two campuses.  Three overarching themes emerged from both the students and faculty throughout the study: (1) The construction of a knowledge-based community of practice, (2) responsiveness to diverse learning preference, and (3) how participants negotiated teaching and learning within the multidirectional digital classroom. Conclusion: These findings have the capacity to provide guidance when re-designing and facilitating medical school curricula and for learners who engage in new multidirectional digital environments.  Regardless of teaching site, all educators must be mindful of students’ learning needs and recognize how the overall learning experience is influenced by faculty, physical environment, and the ways in which students interact with one another daily.  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document