scholarly journals Gender Differences in Leadership Amongst First-Year Medical Students in the Small-Group Setting

2010 ◽  
Vol 85 (8) ◽  
pp. 1276-1281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy L. Wayne ◽  
Michelle Vermillion ◽  
Sebastian Uijtdehaage
1983 ◽  
Vol 58 (10) ◽  
pp. 817-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
F L Ficklin ◽  
J D Hazelwood ◽  
J E Carter ◽  
R H Shellhamer

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 216
Author(s):  
Theodora Teunissen ◽  
Joni Scholte ◽  
Fransica Van der Meulen ◽  
Antoinette Lagro-Janssen ◽  
Cornelia Fluit

Sex and gender are important determinants of healthcare that need to be taken into account for medical teaching. Education is more effective if tailored to students’ subjectively-perceived needs and connected to their prior knowledge and opinions. This study explored first-year medical students thoughts about sex and gender differences in general and in specifically in healthcare, and what their educational preferences are in learning about these concepts during their medical training. Therefore six focus groups were conducted with 26 first-year medical students, 7 male and 19 female students, within one Dutch medical faculty. The discussions were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. After that a thematic analysis was performed which included descriptive coding, interpretative coding, and definition of overarching themes.  Three major themes were identified. (1) Students’ self-perception of concepts sex and gender, including three major domains: (a) The unavoidable allocation of individuals to groups, (b) The role of stereotypes, and (c) The effect of sex/gender on career choice options. (2) Students’ goal orientedness in learning about sex/gender. (3) Students’ struggles between the binary system of medicine and the complexity of reality. Continuous reflection during medical school might help medical students to acquire sex- and gender-sensitive competencies that can be applied in their future work. To increase awareness about the influence of sex and gender differences in healthcare and on career choices, we recommend addressing these themes explicitly early on in the medical curriculum.


Author(s):  
Stefano Ardenghi ◽  
Giulia Rampoldi ◽  
Marco Bani ◽  
Maria Grazia Strepparava

AbstractThe present study contributes to the literature by examining the association between personal values (PVs), assessed with the Schwartz’s Portrait Values Questionnaire, and empathy, assessed with the Davis’ Interpersonal Reactivity Index, in a sample of first-year medical students. We also examined medical students’ PVs profile and gender differences in terms of PVs. All participants (N = 398) were Italian, young (average age = 19.62 years, SD = 1.22), and unmarried; none had children. Zero-order correlations and hierarchical multiple regression models were performed to verify the association between PVs and empathy; in contrast, t-tests were run to explore gender differences in scoring on PVs. Benevolence and Universalism correlated positively with both the emotional and cognitive dimensions of empathy, whereas Power, Achievement, Hedonism, and Security were negatively associated with empathy. The three most important PVs in the whole sample were Benevolence, Self-Direction, and Universalism. Male medical students outscored their female counterparts on Power, Achievement, and Hedonism, whereas female students outscored the males on Benevolence, Universalism, Conformity, and Tradition. Our findings highlight the importance of fostering self-transcending PVs and discouraging self-enhancing PVs in medical students during the early years of medical school, as a means of supporting other-oriented responses such as empathy in future doctors.


2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 1256-1262
Author(s):  
Kavana G.Venkatappa ◽  
Smrithi Shetty C ◽  
Sparshadeep E.M ◽  
Shibin Girish Parakandy ◽  
Das S.K

1988 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard B. Roback ◽  
Pauline L. Rabin ◽  
John E. Chapman

The authors investigated gender differences among first year medical students' attitudes towards a discussion-oriented, Behavioral Science course, performance on an end of course essay, and locus of control. Female medical students generally evaluated the course more favorably than their male counterparts, and scored higher on the Rotter I-E scale (i.e., were more “external'). There were no gender differences in essay grades. Implications of the findings are discussed and future research directions are suggested.


MedEdPublish ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrina D'Urzo ◽  
Ashley Johnson ◽  
Brittany McEachern ◽  
Iain McPhee ◽  
Andrea Brennan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document