scholarly journals A Half Century of Health Data for the U.S. Population: The Integrated Health Interview Series

Author(s):  
Miriam L. King
2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 979-984 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Kennedy ◽  
John M. Roll ◽  
Taylor Schraudner ◽  
Sean Murphy ◽  
Sterling McPherson

1994 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy Krieger ◽  
Elizabeth Fee

National vital statistics in the United States are unique among those of advanced capitalist countries in reporting data only by race, sex, and age—not by class and income. This article reviews the limited U.S. data resources that may be used to document social class inequalities in health. Summarizing the strengths and weaknesses of the British approach to gathering data on social class and health, the authors discuss possible approaches to collecting data that could be feasible in the U.S. context. They argue that educational level is an insufficient marker for socioeconomic position and contend that appropriate measures must take into account not only individual but also household and neighborhood markers of social class. These additional types of social class data are especially important for accurately describing and understanding social class inequalities in health among women and across diverse racial/ethnic groups.


2003 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 535-554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joan B. Anderson
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 501-511
Author(s):  
Timothy M. Gill

In his seminal text, The Power Elite, C. Wright Mills initially drew critical attention to U.S. state power, asserting that economic, political, and military elites flow through a revolving door, cycling in and out of positions of power. Following its publication, several social scientists began to examine the nature of the U.S. state, including individuals like G. William Domhoff and Michael Useem. One particular work by Peter Freitag examined the class composition of presidential cabinets. Freitag examined whether presidential cabinet members came from the elite corporate sphere, went into the elite corporate sphere following their tenure in office, the extent of interlocks among the Democratic and Republican Parties, and whether particular cabinet positions were more interlocked with the elite corporate sphere than others. In this article, I examine these same questions, looking at presidential cabinets between 1968 and 2018, that is, across the last half-century. In doing so, I find consistency with many of Freitag’s initial findings: most presidential cabinets remain heavily interlocked, there is little difference between Democratic and Republican cabinets, and there is a significant amount of cabinet members that come from and enter the elite corporate sphere following their time in office.


2018 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-151
Author(s):  
Gilbert B. Becker

The U.S. antitrust agencies’ Horizontal Merger Guidelines are approaching their half century mark, having progressed through three earlier versions to their current 2010 form. Recent reports promote the contention that the enhanced sophistication and transparency of the newer versions have led to improved policy results. This study questions this conclusion by examining recent retrospective merger case evidence as well as agency policy and practices, in light of long-held Supreme Court dicta.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document