scholarly journals Studentized Sensitivity Analysis for the Sample Average Treatment Effect in Paired Observational Studies

2019 ◽  
Vol 115 (531) ◽  
pp. 1518-1530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin B. Fogarty
2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annie Franco ◽  
Neil Malhotra ◽  
Gabor Simonovits ◽  
L. J. Zigerell

AbstractWeighting techniques are employed to generalize results from survey experiments to populations of theoretical and substantive interest. Although weighting is often viewed as a second-order methodological issue, these adjustment methods invoke untestable assumptions about the nature of sample selection and potential heterogeneity in the treatment effect. Therefore, although weighting is a useful technique in estimating population quantities, it can introduce bias and also be used as a researcher degree of freedom. We review survey experiments published in three major journals from 2000–2015 and find that there are no standard operating procedures for weighting survey experiments. We argue that all survey experiments should report the sample average treatment effect (SATE). Researchers seeking to generalize to a broader population can weight to estimate the population average treatment effect (PATE), but should discuss the construction and application of weights in a detailed and transparent manner given the possibility that weighting can introduce bias.


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiwei Zhang ◽  
Zonghui Hu ◽  
Chunling Liu

AbstractWe consider causal inference in observational studies with choice-based sampling, in which subject enrollment is stratified on treatment choice. Choice-based sampling has been considered mainly in the econometrics literature, but it can be useful for biomedical studies as well, especially when one of the treatments being compared is uncommon. We propose new methods for estimating the population average treatment effect under choice-based sampling, including doubly robust methods motivated by semiparametric theory. A doubly robust, locally efficient estimator may be obtained by replacing nuisance functions in the efficient influence function with estimates based on parametric models. The use of machine learning methods to estimate nuisance functions leads to estimators that are consistent and asymptotically efficient under broader conditions. The methods are compared in simulation experiments and illustrated in the context of a large observational study in obstetrics. We also make suggestions on how to choose the target proportion of treated subjects and the sample size in designing a choice-based observational study.


2016 ◽  
Vol 35 (21) ◽  
pp. 3717-3732 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura B. Balzer ◽  
Maya L. Petersen ◽  
Mark J. van der Laan ◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document