The Sample Average Treatment Effect

2018 ◽  
pp. 175-193
Author(s):  
Laura B. Balzer ◽  
Maya L. Petersen ◽  
Mark J. van der Laan
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Effect ◽  
Average Treatment Effect ◽  
Average Treatment ◽  
Sample Average

Developing Standards for Post-Hoc Weighting in Population-Based Survey Experiments

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annie Franco ◽  
Neil Malhotra ◽  
Gabor Simonovits ◽  
L. J. Zigerell
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Effect ◽  
Methodological Issue ◽  
Sample Selection ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Average Treatment Effect ◽  
Average Treatment ◽  
Sample Average ◽  
Population Average ◽  
Survey Experiments ◽  
Post Hoc

AbstractWeighting techniques are employed to generalize results from survey experiments to populations of theoretical and substantive interest. Although weighting is often viewed as a second-order methodological issue, these adjustment methods invoke untestable assumptions about the nature of sample selection and potential heterogeneity in the treatment effect. Therefore, although weighting is a useful technique in estimating population quantities, it can introduce bias and also be used as a researcher degree of freedom. We review survey experiments published in three major journals from 2000–2015 and find that there are no standard operating procedures for weighting survey experiments. We argue that all survey experiments should report the sample average treatment effect (SATE). Researchers seeking to generalize to a broader population can weight to estimate the population average treatment effect (PATE), but should discuss the construction and application of weights in a detailed and transparent manner given the possibility that weighting can introduce bias.

scholarly journals Targeted estimation and inference for the sample average treatment effect in trials with and without pair-matching

2016 ◽  
Vol 35 (21) ◽  
pp. 3717-3732 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura B. Balzer ◽  
Maya L. Petersen ◽  
Mark J. van der Laan ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Effect ◽  
Average Treatment Effect ◽  
Average Treatment ◽  
Sample Average ◽  
Pair Matching

scholarly journals Evaluación de impacto académico y social en egresados universitarios

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 695-712
Author(s):  
Gabriel González ◽  
Luisa Díez-Echavarría ◽  
Elkin Zapa ◽  
Danilo Eusse
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Effect ◽  
Average Treatment Effect ◽  
Educación Superior ◽  
Educacion Superior ◽  
Average Treatment

Las instituciones de educación superior deben formar a sus estudiantes según requerimientos del contexto en que se desenvuelven, ya que, sobre la base de su desempeño, es donde se medirá si las políticas de desarrollo socioeconómico son efectivas. Para lograrlo, es necesario identificar el impacto de esa educación en sus egresados, y hacer los ajustes necesarios que generen mejora continua. El objetivo de este artículo es estimar el impacto académico y social de egresados del Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano – Medellín, a través de un análisis multivariado y la estimación del modelo Average Treatment Effect (ATE). Se encontró que la educación ofrecida a esta población ha generado un impacto académico, asociado a los estudios de actualización, y dos impactos sociales, asociados a la situación laboral y al nivel de ingresos percibidos por los egresados. Se recomienda usar esta metodología en otras instituciones, ya que suele arrojar resultados más informativos y precisos que los estudios tradicionales de caracterización, y se puede medir el efecto de cualquier estrategia.

The Effect of Extension Services and Credit on Agricultural Production in Bolivia, Peru, and Colombia

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mateus C. R. Neves ◽  
Felipe De Figueiredo Silva ◽  
Carlos Otávio Freitas
Keyword(s):  
Travel Time ◽  
Treatment Effect ◽  
Agricultural Production ◽  
Treatment Effects ◽  
Geographic Information ◽  
Average Treatment Effect ◽  
Extension Services ◽  
Average Treatment ◽  
Andean Countries ◽  
Average Treatment Effects

In this paper we estimate the average treatment effect from access to extension services and credit on agricultural production in selected Andean countries (Bolivia, Peru, and Colombia). More specifically, we want to identify the effect of accessibility, here represented as travel time to the nearest area with 1,500 or more inhabitants per square kilometer or at least 50,000 inhabitants, on the likelihood of accessing extension and credit. To estimate the treatment effect and identify the effect of accessibility on these variables, we use data from the Colombian and Bolivian Agricultural Censuses of 2013 and 2014, respectively; a national agricultural survey from 2017 for Peru; and geographic information on travel time. We find that the average treatment effect for extension is higher compared to that of credit for farms in Bolivia and Peru, and lower for Colombia. The average treatment effects of extension and credit for Peruvian farms are $2,387.45 and $3,583.42 respectively. The average treatment effect for extension and credit are $941.92 and $668.69, respectively, while in Colombia are $1,365.98 and $1,192.51, respectively. We also find that accessibility and the likelihood of accessing these services are nonlinearly related. Results indicate that higher likelihood is associated with lower travel time, especially in the analysis of credit.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document