scholarly journals Assisted Living Facility Administrator and Direct Care Staff Views of Resident Mental Health Concerns and Staff Training Needs

2011 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Dakin ◽  
Louise M. Quijano ◽  
Courtney McAlister
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S545-S545
Author(s):  
Paula Carder ◽  
Lindsey Smith ◽  
Seamus Taylor ◽  
Brian Kaskie ◽  
Kali S Thomas

Abstract We describe two categories of dementia-specific AL requirements: staff training and admission/discharge criteria. We reviewed current requirements for all states and the District of Columbia, and amendments made over 12 years. Current and historic regulations were collected and analyzed using policy surveillance and qualitative coding. Twenty-three states currently require dementia-specific training, and 22 require continuing education. Nearly all states (49) require administrators to complete dementia-specific training. Of these, 13 states specified 7 to 120 hours of dementia care training. Some states added pre-admission screening for cognitive impairment; a few require a dementia diagnosis for admission. We describe state variation longitudinally in direct care staff training requirements, including: number of training hours, training content, and use of examinations or other tests of knowledge, skills and abilities. In addition, we categorize changes in admission/discharge criteria over time, including the use of medical versus behavioral health symptoms.


2002 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 398-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce B. Way ◽  
Barbara Stone ◽  
Marian Schwager ◽  
Deborah Wagoner ◽  
Ronald Bassman

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S441-S441
Author(s):  
Paula Carder ◽  
Sarah Dys

Abstract In 2003, the Assisted Living Workgroup (ALW) published quality improvement recommendations for states’ regulations, including 26 regarding staffing/workforce. We reviewed states’ 2003 and current regulations to identify the presence of ALW standards. Over half of states’ regulations reflect 7 of the 26 staffing/workforce recommendations. Those most often added after 2003 concern criminal background checks, with a 58.8 percent increase in states that added federal background checks and use of criminal background checks to inform hiring. At least 40 states’ regulations reflect the ALW recommendations for administrator and direct care staff training. Very few states require staff performance evaluations (n=13), human resource policies to improve retention (n=1), or management practices to improve retention (0). The 10 ALW recommendations concerning staff who administer medications have been adopted by fewer than 23 states. These findings can inform future policy analysis and research on staffing/workforce in assisted living communities.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 721-721
Author(s):  
D Woods ◽  
L Phillips ◽  
R Johnson ◽  
V Knox

2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-28
Author(s):  
Hilary Brown

Purpose – This paper is a commentary on “The effectiveness of psychodynamic interventions for people with learning disabilities: a systematic review” by Chris James and James Stacey. The purpose of this paper is to illustrate the thesis that standardised ways of evaluating health care interventions may have the inadvertent effect of undermining the case that people with intellectual disabilities should be offered the same opportunities to address their emotional and mental health difficulties as other citizens. Design/methodology/approach – The commentary argues that while the evidence base focuses on the outcomes of orthodox one-to-one interventions, sometimes broader “contextual reformulation” and systemic interventions are called for. However, family- or service-based interventions tend not to feature in studies. Findings – The commentary illustrates these issues by discussing two case studies, which demonstrate how relational issues tend to be unhelpfully focused on the person with intellectual disabilities to the detriment of family members or direct care staff, who may be struggling to make sense of the person's behaviour or distress. Originality/value – The commentary supports the argument put forward in the longer paper and also argues for mental health services to be offered on a non-discriminatory basis to people with intellectual disabilities and to their family members. But it also suggests that one of the additional impacts of service level psychotherapeutic interventions is to re-establish respect for the work of direct care staff whose work is often presented as if it is little more than domestic drudgery when in fact it involves negotiating and responding to people and their issues with great sensitivity and balance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document