Expression of EGFR Family and Steroid Hormone Receptors in Ductal Carcinoma in situ of the Breast

2001 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 349-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhenhe Suo, Asle Bjaamer ◽  
Lars Ottestad ◽  
Jahn Nesland
2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-110
Author(s):  
Hugo Villanueva ◽  
Sandra L. Grimm ◽  
Sagar Dhamne ◽  
Kimal Rajapakshe ◽  
Adriana P. Visbal ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 126-131
Author(s):  
Angelika Reiner ◽  
Margaretha Rudas ◽  
Renate Neumayer ◽  
M. F. X. Gnant ◽  
Martina Mittlböck ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 237-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugo Villanueva ◽  
Sandra Grimm ◽  
Sagar Dhamne ◽  
Kimal Rajapakshe ◽  
Adriana Visbal ◽  
...  

Abstract Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a non-obligate precursor to most types of invasive breast cancer (IBC). Although it is estimated only one third of untreated patients with DCIS will progress to IBC, standard of care for treatment is surgery and radiation. This therapeutic approach combined with a lack of reliable biomarker panels to predict DCIS progression is a major clinical problem. DCIS shares the same molecular subtypes as IBC including estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) positive luminal subtypes, which encompass the majority (60–70%) of DCIS. Compared to the established roles of ER and PR in luminal IBC, much less is known about the roles and mechanism of action of estrogen (E2) and progesterone (P4) and their cognate receptors in the development and progression of DCIS. This is an underexplored area of research due in part to a paucity of suitable experimental models of ER+/PR + DCIS. This review summarizes information from clinical and observational studies on steroid hormones as breast cancer risk factors and ER and PR as biomarkers in DCIS. Lastly, we discuss emerging experimental models of ER+/PR+ DCIS.


2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 425-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Maddalena Tumedei ◽  
Rosella Silvestrini ◽  
Sara Ravaioli ◽  
Ilaria Massa ◽  
Roberta Maltoni ◽  
...  

Background Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a heterogeneous disease that has not been investigated as widely as invasive breast cancer. Thus, the search for biomarkers capable of identifying DCIS lesions that may recur or progress to invasive cancer is ongoing. Although conventional steroid hormone receptors, cell proliferation and other important tumor markers have been extensively studied in invasive tumors, little is known about the role played by androgen receptors (ARs), widely expressed in breast cancer, in DCIS. Methods We performed a retrospective study in a series of 43 DCIS patients treated with quadrantectomy only and followed up for a period ranging from 5 to 13 years, to evaluate the prognostic relevance of conventional biomarkers (estrogen receptor [ER], progesterone receptor [PgR], Ki67, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [HER2]) and AR. Results Our findings showed that AR and ER were not independent prognostic variables and that an AR/ER ratio cutoff of 1.13 showed a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 94% in predicting in situ relapse or progression to the invasive phenotype. Moreover, while the variables considered singly showed area under the curve (AUC) values ranging from 0.52% to 0.77%, the AR/ER ratio reached a very high AUC (0.92%). Conclusions These preliminary results highlight the potentially important role of AR and ER and, in particular, of their ratio, as prognostic indicators of DCIS evolution.


Mastology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Suppl 1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Felipe Rodrigues Costa Oliveira ◽  
Camila Zerbini Prata ◽  
Gil Facina ◽  
Roberto Araujo Segreto ◽  
Rodrigo Souza Dias

Introduction: The treatment for Ductal Carcinoma in situ (DCIS) can be mastectomy, breast-conserving surgery with or without adjuvant Radiotherapy (RT). Regarding the conserving treatment, ipsilateral recurrence is the main reason of concern. Randomized studies show that RT reduces the risk of local recurrence (LR). Age, comedonecrosis, absence of endocrine therapy (ET) and positive margins are also prognostic factors. Objective: To assess the local relapse-free survival (LRFS) of patients with DCIS treated with breast-conserving surgery, followed by adjuvant RT, and to identify possible prognostic factors related to LR. Method: between March 2007 and December 2017, we identified 95 women diagnosed with DCIS and treated with breast-conserving surgery and adjuvant RT in Hospital São Paulo (HSP/UNIFESP). Regarding RT, we used the 3D technique with conventional fractionation (50/50.4 Gy and 2/1.8 Gy fraction per day), or hypofractionation (40 Gy and 2.67 Gy fraction per day). The data were submitted to descriptive analysis and evaluation of LR. Factors such as characteristics of the patients, the tumor and the treatment were correlated by using Fisher’s Exact Test and Kruskall-Wallis test. The log-rank test was used for the Kaplan-Meier comparison. The results were considered as statistically significant when p<0.05. Results: 71.6% of the patients were 50 years old or older; margins were negative in 70.5% of the cases, and 78.9% of the patients presented with positive hormone receptors. Regarding RT, 89.5% of the patients were treated with conventional fractionation. The median follow-up of patients was 67 months (8-150 months). LRFS was 97.8% and 91.9% in 5 and 10 years, respectively. Among the assessed factors, negative hormone receptors (p<0.001) and absence of ET (p=0.022) were prognostic factors for LR. The margin status was not associated with higher rates of LR. Conclusion: The LRFS of the patients diagnosed with DCIS who underwent a conserving treatment in HSP/UNIFESP is favorably compared to the results described in the literature. Negative hormone receptors and absence of ET had an influence on local control.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document