Cardiac autonomic and haemodynamic recovery after a single session of aerobic exercise with and without blood flow restriction in older adults

2016 ◽  
Vol 35 (24) ◽  
pp. 2412-2420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Lívia Venturini Ferreira ◽  
Amanda Veiga Sardeli ◽  
Giovana Vergínia De Souza ◽  
Valéria Bonganha ◽  
Lucas Do Carmo Santos ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Julio Cezar Schamne ◽  
Adalberto Ferreira Junior ◽  
Amanda Cristiane de Araújo ◽  
Adriano Eduardo Lima-Silva ◽  
Rômulo Cássio de Moraes Bertuzzi ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Júlio C.G. Silva ◽  
Jarbas R. Domingos-Gomes ◽  
Eduardo D.S. Freitas ◽  
Gabriel R. Neto ◽  
Rodrigo R. Aniceto ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol Volume 14 ◽  
pp. 1461-1469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karynne Grutter Lopes ◽  
Daniel Alexandre Bottino ◽  
Paulo Farinatti ◽  
Maria das Graças Coelho de Souza ◽  
Priscila Alves Maranhão ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Darío Rodrigo-Mallorca ◽  
Andrés Felipe Loaiza-Betancur ◽  
Pablo Monteagudo ◽  
Cristina Blasco-Lafarga ◽  
Iván Chulvi-Medrano

Low-intensity training with blood flow restriction (LI-BFR) has been suggested as an alternative to high-intensity resistance training for the improvement of strength and muscle mass, becoming advisable for individuals who cannot assume such a load. The systematic review aimed to determine the effectiveness of the LI-BFR compared to dynamic high-intensity resistance training on strength and muscle mass in non-active older adults. A systematic review was conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook and reportedly followed the PRISMA statement. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science Core Collection, and Scopus databases were searched between September and October 2020. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, extracted data, assessed the risk of bias and the quality of evidence using the GRADE approach. Twelve studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Meta-analysis pointed out significant differences in maximal voluntary contraction (MVC): SMD 0.61, 95% CI [0.10, 1.11], p = 0.02, I2 71% p < 0.0001; but not in the repetition maximum (RM): SMD 0.07, 95% CI [−0.25, 0.40], p = 0.66, I2 0% p < 0.53; neither in the muscle mass: SMD 0.62, 95% CI [−0.09, 1.34], p = 0.09, I2 59% p = 0.05. Despite important limitations such as scarce literature regarding LI-BFR in older adults, the small sample size in most studies, the still differences in methodology and poor quality in many of them, this systematic review and meta-analysis revealed a positive benefit in non-active older adults. LI- BFR may induce increased muscular strength and muscle mass, at least at a similar extent to that in the traditional high-intensity resistance training.


2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (7S) ◽  
pp. 888-889
Author(s):  
Nathen A. Andrews ◽  
Chase P. Harris ◽  
Kelly E. Johnson ◽  
Justin P. Guilkey ◽  
Jakob D. Lauver

2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (7S) ◽  
pp. 269-269
Author(s):  
Yujiro Yamada ◽  
Ryan Kasprzak ◽  
Alec Mathew ◽  
Shelby Shotton ◽  
Addyson Miller-Brown ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (5S) ◽  
pp. 253
Author(s):  
Brittany N. Esparza ◽  
Margarita Gonzalez ◽  
Patrick Murphy ◽  
Danny Dominguez ◽  
Murat Karabulut

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document