Prognostic factors of return to work after acquired brain injury: A systematic review

Brain Injury ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 385-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. van Velzen ◽  
C. A. M. van Bennekom ◽  
M. J. A. Edelaar ◽  
J. K. Sluiter ◽  
M. H. W. Frings-Dresen
Brain Injury ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 550-557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sander F. Garrelfs ◽  
Birgit H. P. M. Donker-Cools ◽  
Haije Wind ◽  
Monique H. W. Frings-Dresen

Brain Injury ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Birgit H. P. M. Donker-Cools ◽  
Joost G. Daams ◽  
Haije Wind ◽  
Monique H. W. Frings-Dresen

Brain Injury ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 473-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. van Velzen ◽  
C. A. M. van Bennekom ◽  
M. J. A. Edelaar ◽  
J. K. Sluiter ◽  
M. H. W. Frings-Dresen

2015 ◽  
Vol 38 (8) ◽  
pp. 733-741 ◽  
Author(s):  
Birgit H. P. M. Donker-Cools ◽  
Haije Wind ◽  
Monique H. W. Frings-Dresen

2007 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth J. Nightingale ◽  
Cheryl A. Soo ◽  
Robyn L. Tate

AbstractThis article presents a systematic review identifying variables and their prognostic value for return to work (RTW) after traumatic brain injury (TBI). RTW has been identified as being a key goal following TBI, with estimates ranging from 10% to 70%. Prediction of postinjury employment is important for planning rehabilitation and structuring individualised vocational services. Studies examining prognostic factors were identified by searching four electronic databases, until June 2006. Searches yielded 1948 studies of which 55 met inclusion criteria and were subsequently rated for methodological quality. Mean methodological score for included studies was 3.9/6 (SD 0.9, range 1–6). Analysis focused on a subset of 27 studies which provided sampling from all three domains of preinjury, injury and early postinjury variables. Few studies considered preinjury variables, apart from simple demographics. Only five studies considered preinjury employment, which was a significant predictor in each case. Severity of injury variables were invariably examined, but were significant predictors in only 8/27 studies (30%). For early postinjury variables, 14/27 studies entered cognitive variables with 12/14 (86%) identifying them as significant predictors; 3/27 studies examined neurophysical variables, with 2/3 (67%) studies finding them significant; and 12/27 studies examined multidimensional/participation variables which were statistically significant individual predictors in 8/12 (67%) cases. The results are discussed in the context of methodological issues encountered during the course of the review that require addressing in future studies.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-21
Author(s):  
Kerrin Watter ◽  
Areti Kennedy ◽  
Vanette McLennan ◽  
Jessica Vogler ◽  
Sarah Jeffery ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Following acquired brain injury, the goal of return to work is common. While return to work is supported through different rehabilitation models and services, access to vocational rehabilitation varies within and between countries, and global rates of employment post-injury remain low. The literature identifies outcomes from vocational programs and experiences with return to work, yet little is known about individuals’ perceptions and experiences regarding rehabilitation to support their vocational goals and experiences in attempting to return to work. Method: This qualitative study investigated the experiences of community-living adults with acquired brain injury (n = 8; mean age 45 years; mean time post-injury of 5.5 years) regarding their vocational rehabilitation and return to work. Focus groups and semi-structured interviews were conducted, with data analyzed via thematic analysis. Results: Participants identified negative and positive experiences with vocational rehabilitation and return to work. Five overarching themes were identified: addressing vocational rehabilitation in rehabilitation; facilitators of recovery and return to work; the importance and experience of working again; acquired brain injury and identity; and services, systems and policies. Participants also identified five key areas for early vocational rehabilitation services: education; service provision; employer liaison; workplace supports; and peer mentors. Study findings inform current and future practice and service delivery, at a clinical, service and system level.


Brain Injury ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 1135-1145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arend J. de Kloet ◽  
Rianne Gijzen ◽  
Lucia W. Braga ◽  
Jorit J. L. Meesters ◽  
Jan W. Schoones ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (7) ◽  
pp. 779-790 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jodie Marquez ◽  
Ishanka Weerasekara ◽  
Lucia Chambers

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document