scholarly journals Resource Managers: North American and Australian Hunter-Gatherers

1987 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 425-426
Author(s):  
Atholl Anderson
1986 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 140
Author(s):  
George W. Wenzel ◽  
Nancy M. Williams ◽  
Eugene S. Hunn

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle R. Bebber ◽  
Alastair J. M. Key ◽  
Michael Fisch ◽  
Richard S. Meindl ◽  
Metin I. Eren

Oceanography ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 170-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandria Boehm ◽  
◽  
Mark Jacobson ◽  
Michael O'Donnell ◽  
Martha Sutula ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clifford Ian Workman ◽  
Kristopher M Smith ◽  
Coren Lee Apicella ◽  
Anjan Chatterjee

People have an “anomalous-is-bad” stereotype whereby they make negative inferences about the moral character of people with craniofacial anomalies like scars. This stereotype is hypothesized to be a byproduct of adaptations for avoiding pathogens. However, evidence for the anomalous-is-bad stereotype comes from studies of European and North American populations; the byproduct hypothesis would predict universality of the stereotype. We presented 123 Hadza across ten camps pairs of morphed Hadza faces—each with one face altered to include a scar—and asked who they expected to be more moral and a better forager. Hadza with minimal exposure to other cultures chose at chance for both questions. Hadza with greater exposure to other cultures, however, expected the scarred face to be less moral and a better forager. These results suggest the anomalous-is-bad stereotype is culturally shared, providing evidence against a universal pathogen avoidance byproduct hypothesis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document