scholarly journals Kinematic dynamo action of a precession-driven flow based on the results of water experiments and hydrodynamic simulations.

2018 ◽  
Vol 113 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 235-255
Author(s):  
André Giesecke ◽  
Tobias Vogt ◽  
Thomas Gundrum ◽  
Frank Stefani
2002 ◽  
Vol 397 (2) ◽  
pp. 393-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Archontis ◽  
S. B. F. Dorch ◽  
Å. Nordlund

2010 ◽  
Vol 6 (S271) ◽  
pp. 239-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R. E. Proctor ◽  
David W. Hughes

AbstractFollowing earlier work by Hughes & Proctor (2009) on the role of velocity shear in convectively driven dynamos, we present preliminary results on the nature of dynamo action due to modified flows derived by filtration from the full convective flow. The results suggest that filtering the flow fields has surprisingly little effect on the dynamo growth rates.


Author(s):  
David Gubbins ◽  
C. N. Barber ◽  
S. Gibbons ◽  
J. J. Love

2005 ◽  
Vol 535 ◽  
pp. 347-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. ZABIELSKI ◽  
A. J. MESTEL

2007 ◽  
Vol 146 (1) ◽  
pp. 313-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. de la Torre ◽  
J. Burguete ◽  
C. Pérez-García

2018 ◽  
Vol 839 ◽  
pp. 1-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Chen ◽  
W. Herreman ◽  
K. Li ◽  
P. W. Livermore ◽  
J. W. Luo ◽  
...  

We present a variational optimization method that can identify the most efficient kinematic dynamo in a sphere, where efficiency is based on the value of a magnetic Reynolds number that uses enstrophy to characterize the inductive effects of the fluid flow. In this large-scale optimization, we restrict the flow to be steady and incompressible, and the boundary of the sphere to be no-slip and electrically insulating. We impose these boundary conditions using a Galerkin method in terms of specifically designed vector field bases. We solve iteratively for the flow field and the accompanying magnetic eigenfunction in order to find the minimal critical magnetic Reynolds number $Rm_{c,min}$ for the onset of a dynamo. Although nonlinear, this iteration procedure converges to a single solution and there is no evidence that this is not a global optimum. We find that $Rm_{c,min}=64.45$ is at least three times lower than that of any published example of a spherical kinematic dynamo generated by steady flows, and our optimal dynamo clearly operates above the theoretical lower bounds for dynamo action. The corresponding optimal flow has a spatially localized helical structure in the centre of the sphere, and the dominant components are invariant under rotation by $\unicode[STIX]{x03C0}$.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document