Evaluating the relative efficiency among robust estimation methods for multilevel factor analysis with categorical data

Author(s):  
R. Noah Padgett ◽  
Grant B. Morgan
1981 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence C. Hamilton

Exploratory data analysis (EDA) is used to study errors in self-reports of lest scores and grades from a survey sample of college students. Both response and non-response are found to be systematically biased, with unfortunate effects in combination. Errors are not normally distributed, and would be better modeled as contaminated distributions made up of two or more simple distributions. Errors are correlated with each other and with other variables, leading to spuriously inflated as well as deflated intervariable correlations. These findings may be typical of survey data in general; hence, more realistic error models and robust estimation methods are desirable.


2011 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 14-29
Author(s):  
Silvia Gašincová ◽  
Juraj Gašinec ◽  
Gabriel Weiss ◽  
Slavomír Labant

Abstract The basis of mathematical analysis of geodetic measurements is the method of least squares (LSM), whose bicentenary we celebrated in 2006. In geodetic practice, we quite often encounter the phenomenon when outlier measurements penetrate into the set of measured data as a result of e.g. the impact of physical environment. That fact led to modifications of LSM that have been increasingly published mainly in foreign literature in recent years. The mentioned alternative estimation methods are e.g. robust estimation methods and methods in linear programming. The aim of the present paper is to compare LSM with the robust estimation methods on an example of a regression line.


2016 ◽  
Vol 85 (2) ◽  
pp. 270-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Graham Clark ◽  
Philip Kokic ◽  
Paul A. Smith

Metrika ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. H. Ketellapper ◽  
A. E. Ronner

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document