Dreading delayed punishment: Reconceptualizing sanction “celerity”

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-19
Author(s):  
Chae M. Jaynes ◽  
Theodore Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Delayed Punishment

Effectiveness of Delayed Punishment on Learning Performance When Preceded by Premonitory Cues

1955 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 441-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Bevan ◽  
William F. Dukes
Keyword(s):  
Learning Performance ◽  
Delayed Punishment

Effectiveness of delayed punishment in an applied setting

1990 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 231-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann J. Abramowitz ◽  
Susan G. O'Leary
Keyword(s):  
Delayed Punishment

scholarly journals A Pilot Study on the Effectiveness of a Heat-Pain Stimulus to Induce Pain, Anxiety, and Fear

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillaume Durand
Keyword(s):  
Pain Catastrophizing ◽  
Emotional Responses ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Pain Stimulus ◽  
Pain Anxiety ◽  
Heat Stimulus ◽  
Electric Shocks ◽  
Fear And Anxiety ◽  
Delayed Punishment ◽  
Undergraduate Men

While the majority of previous studies assessing pain-related variables in psychopaths used electric shocks, little is known about the effectiveness of alternative pain-inducing methods to increase emotional responses such as fear and anxiety. A small sample of healthy undergraduate men (N = 15) was recruited to assess the effectiveness of a heat stimulus to induce pain in an immediate versus delayed punishment paradigm. Although pain catastrophizing, anxiety, and threat of pain did not increase throughout the experiment, participants experienced a significant increase of fear of pain and pain intensity, indicating that the heat stimulus was effective in inducing pain. Furthermore, subjects were slower in initiating the pain stimulus during the first five trials, but no time difference was found during the 15 remaining trials. No correlation was found between psychopathic traits and pain-related variables, with the exception of inconsistent results within the Fearless Dominance factor. Findings are discussed in terms of improvement for a larger scale study involving psychopathic individuals.

A Classical Conditioning Procedure to Control Suppression of a Rewarded Response Punished after Delay

1966 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. D. Vogel-Sprott
Keyword(s):  
Classical Conditioning ◽  
Instrumental Response ◽  
Response Suppression ◽  
Conditioning Procedure ◽  
Conditioning Paradigm ◽  
Delayed Punishment ◽  
Practical Implications ◽  
Classical Conditioning Procedure

The suppression of a rewarded response receiving delayed punishment was examined when a stimulus, previously paired in conditioning trials with punishment, was introduced briefly with the response. Three groups of 20 alcoholics were employed. All received preliminary stimulation by a tone and punishment (shock), but only Group E received these stimuli in a conditioning paradigm. An instrumental response was subsequently trained in all Ss under immediate reward (money). When performance reached criterion, delayed punishment also was administered for this response. During these punished trials, the tone occurred briefly, immediately following the rewarded response for Groups E and C1. The remaining group (C2) received no tone on these trials. The response was more quickly suppressed in E than in C groups, and the two C groups did not differ in response suppression. The evidence was interpreted in terms of classical conditioning principles, and some practical implications of this finding were considered.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document